★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Medical Science OPEN ACCESS

Comparison Of Endoscopic and Open Decompression of The Ulnar Nerve in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Diego Figueirêdo Macêdo Secundo
Médico Residente de Ortopedia e Traumatologia pelo Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, PE
Luis Fernando Warpechowski Krammer
Médico Residente de Ortopedia e Traumatologia pelo Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Canoas, RS
Caio Rodrigues Coelho Mendes
Médico Residente de Ortopedia e Traumatologia pelo Hospital Aroldo Tourinho, Montes Claros, MG
Gustavo Petracco
Médico Ortopedista e Traumatologista pelo Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Canoas, RS
Melissa Alves Aires Marques
Acadêmica de Medicina da Universidade Iguaçu, Itaperuna, RJ
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Issue09-06
tajmspr 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 09 SEPTEMBER
FULL TEXT PP. 35-44
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 7
ISSUE 09
YEAR 2025
PAGES 35-44
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limb, associated with symptoms of pain, paresthesia and hand weakness, with a significant impact on patients' quality of life.1 The primary surgical treatment is decompression of the ulnar nerve using the open in situ technique, with good scientific evidence and a low complication rate. 2

Minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic in situ decompression (EISD), have emerged as an alternative, promising smaller scars, less postoperative pain and faster functional return. Doubts remain about the safety, efficacy and complication profile of these techniques when compared to open in situ decompression (OISD).2

Randomized clinical trials, such as those by Elwenspoek et al. in 2014-2017 with 45 patients, showed equivalence in clinical outcomes (Bishop's excellent/optimal score between 90-96%), but with less chronic scar pain and better aesthetic satisfaction in the endoscopic group, albeit with a longer operative time. Another randomized double-blind study (2008-2011, 56 cases) corroborated the similarity of functional results, observing a higher incidence of hematomas in the endoscopic group. 2,3

Two contemporary meta-analyses consolidate this perception: The meta-analysis of 686 cases revealed endoscopic decompression with longer surgical duration, increased risk of hematoma and acute pain, but less postoperative paresthesia and better grip strength. And a previous meta-analysis comparing eight studies (582 patients) confirmed equivalent efficacy, highlighting less painful scar sensitivity in the endoscopic group .3

To this end, despite equivalence in functional and clinical outcomes, EISD offers advantages in terms of scar, chronic pain and grip strength, at the cost of longer surgical time and risk of hematoma, more robust and standardized studies are needed. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to rigorously compare efficacy, safety and technical quality between endoscopic and open decompression of the ulnar nerve in CTS, with a focus on clinical impact and decision-making guidelines for orthopaedic practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Smeraglia F, Del Buono A, Maffulli N. Endoscopic cubital tunnel release: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2015;116:155-163. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldv049
  2. Byvaltsev VA, Stepanov IA, Kerimbayev TT. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing open versus endoscopic in situ decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol Belg. 2020;120(1):1-8. doi:10.1007/s13760-019-01149-9
  3. Krejčí T, Večeřa Z, Krejčí O, Šalounová D, Houdek M, Lipina R. Comparing endoscopic and open decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(10):2011-2017. doi:10.1007/s00701-018-3647-0
  4. Schmidt S, Kleist Welch-Guerra W, Matthes M, Baldauf J, Schminke U, Schroeder HW. Endoscopic vs Open Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study. Neurosurgery. 2015 Dec;77(6):960-70; discussion 970-1. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000981. PMID: 26595347.
  5. Dützmann S, Martin KD, Sobottka S, Marquardt G, Schackert G, Seifert V, Krishnan KG. Open vs retractor-endoscopic in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2013 Apr;72(4):605-16; discussion 614-6. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182846dbd. PMID: 23277372.
  6. Krejčí T, Večeřa Z, Krejčí O, Šalounová D, Houdek M, Lipina R. Comparing endoscopic and open decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Oct;160(10):2011-2017. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3647-0. Epub 2018 Aug 15. PMID: 30112716.
  7. Schwarm FP, Nagl J, Graf K, Reinges MHT, Uhl E, Krishnan KG, Kolodziej MA. A prospective randomized study comparing retractor-endoscopic vs. open release of carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndromes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222:107437. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107437. Epub 2022 Sep 19. PMID: 36182782.
  8. Bultmann C, Hoffmann R. Die endoskopische Dekompression des Nervus ulnaris bei Kubitaltunnelsyndrom [Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2009;21(2):193-205. doi:10.1007/s00064-009-1707-6
  9. Watts AC, Bain GI. Patient-rated outcome of ulnar nerve decompression: a comparison of endoscopic and open in situ decompression. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(8):1492-1498. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.014
  10. Sprangers PN, van der Heijden EPA. Protocol for Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release (EVOCU): an open randomized controlled trial : EVOCU trial: Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):137. Published 2023 Feb 22. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06234-y
  11. Carlton A, Khalid SI. Surgical Approaches and Their Outcomes in the Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Front Surg. 2018;5:48. Published 2018 Jul 26. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2018.00048
  12. Öztürk T, Zengin EÇ, Şener U, Şener M. Endoscopic versus open in situ decompression for the management of cubital tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022;56(2):125-130. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2022.21143
  13. Lucchina S, Fusetti C, Guidi M. Sonographic Follow-Up of Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing in Situ Open Neurolysis or Endoscopic Release: The SPECTRE Study. Hand (N Y). 2021;16(3):385-390. doi:10.1177/1558944719857816
  14. Spies CK, Schäfer M, Langer MF, Bruckner T, Müller LP, Unglaub F. Functional outcome after endoscopic assisted release of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: mid-to-long term results. Int Orthop. 2018;42(6):1331-1337. doi:10.1007/s00264-018-3760-y
  15. Graesser EA, Dy CJ, Brogan DM. Future Considerations in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Compressive Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022;5(4):536-546. Published 2022 Nov 30. doi:10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.10.009
  16. Sprangers PN, van der Heijden EPA. Protocol for Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release (EVOCU): an open randomized controlled trial : EVOCU trial: Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital tunnel release. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):137. Published 2023 Feb 22. doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06234-y
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.

JOURNAL ARTICLE 2023

TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE OF OSTEOARTICULAR PAIN AND MENTAL HEALTH

Melissa Alves Aires Marques, Bianca Gabriella De Oliveira, Allan Rodrigues Corsini, Cícero Azevedo De Moraes Filho, Paloma Pinheiro De Aquino Peixoto, Fabricio Negreiros Holtz, Rafael Costa Nerys, Laís Cristina Pereira Da Silva, Marcella Rodrigues Costa Simoes
PUBLISHED IN The American Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2023): Volume 05 Issue 11
View Article
JOURNAL ARTICLE 2023

SCIENTIFIC UPDATE ON POST-OPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Bianca Gabriella De Oliveira , Melissa Alves Aires Marques , Ábila Dutra Oliveira , Cícero Azevedo De Moraes Filho , Paloma Pinheiro De Aquino Peixoto , Fabricio Negreiros Holtz , Rafael Costa Nerys , Laís Cristina Pereira Da Silva, Marcella Rodrigues Costa Simoes
PUBLISHED IN The American Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2023): Volume 05 Issue 11
View Article
JOURNAL ARTICLE 2023

OSTEOMUSCULARES ADHERENCE TO PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AMONG HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AND ITS MUSCULOSKELETAL REPERCUSSIONS

Bianca Gabriella de Oliveira , Melissa Alves Aires Marques , Gabriel Oliveira Zacheo , Juliana Farias Araujo , Maria Eduarda Bastos Tinoco , Fabricio Negreiros Holtz , Rafael Costa Nerys, Laís Cristina Pereira da Silva , Marcella Rodrigues costa Simoes
PUBLISHED IN The American Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research Vol. 5 No. 12 (2023): Volume 05 Issue 12
View Article