Task-based learning in the digital era: encouraging student creativity and reducing copy-paste culture
Nargiza Akhamedova , Master of MA TESOL Program (Research Pedagogue) Language | Lecturer, Profi University, Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
This study explores how Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT). It is integrated with digital tools, enhances student creativity and combats the widespread issue of copy-paste culture. Drawing from postmethod pedagogy, digital literacy frameworks, and motivational theories, the research highlights how well-designed tasks encourage authentic engagement and foster original thinking. Using classroom data and practical examples, the paper illustrates how digital-era tasks—such as multimodal storytelling, collaborative project creation, and real-world problem-solving—promote autonomy, reduce plagiarism, and increase student investment in language learning. The paper concludes with recommendations for implementing TBLT effectively in technologically enriched environments.
Keywords
Task-Based Language Teaching, Digital Tools, Student Creativity
References
Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P. (2016). Task-Based Language Learning – Insights from and for L2 Writing. John Benjamins.
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university staff. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1857–1873.
Carroll, J. (2007). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Pearson.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2020). Using AI tools to promote learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 4–11.
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24(2), 116–137.
Howard, R. M. (2007). Understanding “Internet plagiarism.” Computers and Composition, 24(1), 3–15.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction. Wiley.
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as philosophy: Implications for teaching. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 34–47.
Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 498–521.
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Pecorari, D. (2013). Academic writing and plagiarism: A linguistic analysis. Bloomsbury.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the Internet, and student learning: Improving academic integrity. Routledge.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nargiza Akhamedova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.