★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Medical Science OPEN ACCESS

Improving the Treatment of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in Pregnant Women: Results of A Clinical Study

Mamasiddikov Akmaljon Anvarovich
Assistant, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
Rakhmonov Doston Norbekovich
Assistant, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan
tajmspr 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 10 OCTOBER
VOLUME 8
ISSUE 10
YEAR 2026
PAGES 13-16

Abstract

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in pregnancy is a complex and clinically important problem. The venous and arterial thromboses characteristic of the syndrome, caused by circulating antiphospholipid antibodies, lead to a range of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes, which calls for improved treatment strategies.

Objective: to optimize the treatment of antiphospholipid syndrome in pregnant women.

Materials and Methods: The study included 56 pregnant women with APS, who were divided into two groups. The groups were comparable in age, parity, and obstetric and somatic pathology but differed in the treatment received. The comparison group (conventional management) comprised 18 pregnant women with APS, all of whom received standard APS therapy, including anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, and glucocorticoids. The main group comprised 38 pregnant women with APS, all of whom received systemic enzyme therapy and plasmapheresis in addition to standard therapy. A separate control group consisted of 30 women with uncomplicated pregnancies.

Results: After 30 days, the conventional therapy group showed elevations compared with controls in von Willebrand factor (by 17.7%), the platelet aggregation index (by 24.1%), the total platelet aggregation index (by 26.2%), soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC; by 55.3%), and early fibrin degradation products (EFDP; by 45.6%) (p<0.05). The platelet disaggregation index decreased by 18.5% and antithrombin III activity by 14.3% (p>0.05). Under conventional therapy, hemostatic parameters changed in different directions during treatment; overall, however, these changes aggravated the disturbances present at baseline. In the main group, treatment produced a more pronounced shift toward normalization of the studied parameters. Significant differences from conventional therapy were found for SFMC (29.7%), EFDP (23.3%), and prothrombin time (14.0%) (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Systemic enzyme therapy combined with plasmapheresis and low-molecular-weight heparin in pregnant women with APS results in near-complete normalization of hemostatic parameters.

Keywords

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) pregnancy systemic enzyme therapy (SET)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Balbi GGM, Pacheco MS, Monticielo OA, Funke A, Danowski A, Santiago MB, Staub HL, Rêgo J, de Andrade DCO.Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Advances in Rheumatology. 2020;60(1):29.
  2. Cohen H, Cuadrado MJ, Erkan D, Duarte-Garcia A, Isenberg DA, Knight JS, Ortel TL, Rahman A, Salmon JE, Tektonidou MG, Williams DJ, Willis R, Woller SC, Andrade D. 16th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force Report on Antiphospholipid Syndrome Treatment Trends. Lupus. 2020;29(12):1571–1593.
  3. Cohen H, Efthymiou M, Devreese KMJ.
  4. Monitoring of anticoagulation in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2021;19(4):892–908.
  5. Devreese KMJ, Zuily S, Meroni PL.
  6. Role of antiphospholipid antibodies in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome. Journal of Translational Autoimmunity. 2021;4:100134.
  7. Kosmuratova ShB, Bitemirova ShK, Zhakieva ShS, Zhylkajdar GM, Kajsazhanova GA.
  8. Clinical and anamnestic risk factors for the development of preeclampsia. Reproductive Medicine (Central Asia). 2024;2:80–87. (In Russian)
  9. Khamashta M, Taraborelli M, Sciascia S, Tincani A.
  10. Antiphospholipid syndrome. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology. 2016;30(1):133–148.
  11. Moore GW.
  12. Analytical challenges in the detection of lupus anticoagulant. Exploration of Immunology. 2023;3(4):300–324.
  13. Sciascia S, Khamashta MA, D’Cruz DP.
  14. Targeted therapy in antiphospholipid syndrome. Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 2014;26(3):269–275.