★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.comPublisher Home ↗
Social Sciences OPEN ACCESS

GERMAN AND FRENCH APPROACHES TO MIGRATION SECURITIZATION PROCESSES

Muydinov Dilshod Najmiddinovich
Doctor of philosophy in political science, associate professor, Independent student of the National University of Uzbekistan
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajssei/Volume06Issue07-11
tajssei 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 07 JULY
FULL TEXT PP. 103-110
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 6
ISSUE 07
YEAR 2024
PAGES 103-110
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

This article compares the situation in France and Germany regarding the securitization of migration. The analysis shows that France is more lenient towards immigrants than Germany and views immigration more as a threat to national statehood. Germany views it as a threat to national security. It also turns out that the issue of immigration has become a subject of debate between the extreme right and left in both countries.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Migration securitization racist and xenophobic discourses against immigration
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. AfD, Programm für Deutschland, Wahlprogramm Bundestagswahl 2017, https://www.afd.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2017-06-01_AfD-Bundestagswahlprogramm_Onlinefassung.pdf
  2. Ayelet Banai & Regina Kreide, Securitization of migration in Germany: the ambivalences of citizenship and human rights, Citizenship Studies, 21:8, 2017, pp. 903-917, DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2017.1380649
  3. Berning C. C. Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) – Germany’s New Radical Right-wing Populist Party. DICE Report 4, 2017.
  4. Ceyhan Ayse and Anastassia Tsoukala. “The securitization of migration in western societies: Ambivalent discourses and policies.” Alternatives 27.1_suppl, 2002, p. 24.
  5. Dirk Nabers, Robert G. Patman, Bush’s political fundamentalism and the war against militant Islam: The US–European divide. Routledge, 2009, 21 p.
  6. Faist T. “Extension du domain de la lute: International Migration and Security before and after September 11, 2001.” International Migration Review 35(1), 2002, p.12.
  7. Helbling M., & Meierrieks D. Terrorism and Migration: An Overview. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 2022, pp. 977-996. doi:10.1017/S0007123420000587
  8. João Estevens, Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies. Comparative Migration Studies, 2018, pp. 6-28.
  9. Ярославна Сарайкина, Дискурс секьюритизации миграции во Франции: от республиканской интеграции к алармизму. Современная Европа, 2021, № 7, с. 133‒142.
  10. Lepsius O. Freiheit, Sicherheit und Terror: Die Rechtslage in Deutschland. Leviathan. Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaften 32(1), 2004, p.75.
  11. Margit Fauzer, Transnational Migration – A National Security Risk? Securitization of Migration Policies in Germany, Spain and the United Kingdom. Center for International Relations, 2006.
  12. Saharso Sawitri. “Headscarves: A Comparison of Public Thought and Public Policy in Germany and the Netherlands.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 10 (4), 2007, pp. 513-530.
  13. Savage T. M. Europe and Islam: Crescent waxing, cultures clashing. Washington Quarterly, 27(3), 2004, pp. 25-50.
  14. Thilo Sarrazin, Deutschland schafft sich ab. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, München 2012.
  15. Ukrike Guérot, Spiegel, 18/2017, s. 128.
  16. van Dooremalen T., & Uitermark J. The framing of 9/11 in American, French, and Dutch national newspapers (2001–2015): An inductive approach to studying events. International Sociology, 36(3), 2021, pp. 464–488.