★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Social Sciences OPEN ACCESS

UNBOXING UNDERSTANDING: SELF-EXPLANATION PROMPTING AS A KEY TO UNLOCKING DEEP LEARNING IN CALCULUS

Sufyani Marethi
Faculty of Education, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Hadi Firdos Prabawanto
Mathematical Education and Natural Science Indonesia University of Education, Indonesia
tajssei 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 01 JANUARY
VOLUME 6
ISSUE 01
YEAR 2024
PAGES 07-11

Abstract

Deep learning in calculus often poses challenges for students, requiring a nuanced approach to foster comprehension. This study explores the efficacy of self-explanation prompting as a key strategy for enhancing deep learning in calculus. The research investigates the impact of guided self-explanation prompts on students' understanding and retention of calculus concepts. By employing a carefully designed intervention, we aim to uncover the mechanisms through which self-explanation facilitates meaningful learning in calculus. The results highlight the potential of self-explanation as a powerful tool in the educational toolkit, shedding light on how it can unlock a deeper understanding of calculus concepts and improve overall learning outcomes.

Keywords

Deep learning Calculus education Self-explanation prompting

References

  1. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working Memory. Science, 255, 556 – 559.
  2. Baddeley, A. (2003). Worki ng memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neurosci ence, 4(10), 829–39.
  3. Baddeley, A. (2010, March 23). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), 136–140.
  4. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29.
  5. Berthold, K., Röder, H., Knörzer, D., Kessler, W., & Renkl, A. (2011). The double-edged effects of explanation prompts. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 69–75.
  6. Bokosmaty, S., Sweller, J., & Kalyuga, S. (2015). Learning Geometry Problem Solving by Studying Worked Examples: Effects of Learner Guidance and Expertise. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 307–333.
  7. Booth, J. L., Lange, K. E., Koedinger, K. R., & Newton, K. J. (2013). Using example problems to improve student learning in algebra: Differentiating between correct and incorrect examples. Learning and Instruction,25, 24–34.
  8. Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in Learning; Evidence-Based Guidlines to Manage Cognitive Load. New York: John Wileyand Son Ltd.
  9. Debue, N., & Leemput, C. van de. (2014). What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(October), 1–12.
  10. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., &Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education(8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill