The Implementation Of Clil At Uzbek Secondary Schools As An Educational Approach
Abstract
The article looks at the definition of CLIL as an innovative approach in teaching as well as
its aims. Most importantly, it examines potentials and challenges of CLIL in implementing
at Uzbek secondary schools and caters for some guidelines to organize a successful CLIL
lesson in classroom. CLIL is being seen more and more as an alternative to ELT (English
Language Teaching), leaving many teachers wondering exactly what CLIL is and whether
they should adopt it. We will invite language educators to consider ways to improve not
only pupils’ language competency and also their subject knowledge in CLIL education in
order to promote a motivational classroom atmosphere whose results will be of
considerable importance for both their study in Higher Education and future working life
Keywords
References
- B.R. Pavlović and J.D. Marković (2012). CLIL in Serbian classrooms, University of
- Kragujevac Faculty of Education in Jagodina
- Ćirković-Miladinović (2007). “Advantages and disadvantages of Content and Language
- Integrated Learning (CLIL)”, Pedagogic faculty, Jagodina 2007.
- Coyle, Do & Hood, Philip & Marsh, David (2010). Content and Language Integrated
- Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Coyle, D A (2006). ‘Developing CLIL: towards a theory of practice’ Monograph 6 APAC
- Graddol (2006). English Next, British Council, The English Company (UK).
- Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and
- Foresight Potential Public Services contract DG EAC: European Commission.
- M. Spratt (2012). Comparing CLIL and ELT, University of Kragujevac Faculty of
- Education in Jagodina