Automated System Of Assessment Of Occupations In Higher Educational Institutions

Abstract

Keywords

References

1. Tyurikov A.G. (2019). New practices of sociological diagnostics of the demand and quality of educational services of universities: methodological and methodological problems. Innovations in education. No. 2. pp.21-33.
2. The concept for the development of higher education in the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030. (2020). National Database of Legislation, 09.10.2019, No. 06/19/5847/3887; April 30, No. 06/20/5987/0521.
3. Sergeeva S.Yu. (2019). Modern approaches and methods for assessing the quality of education. Young scientist. No. 37 (275). pp.162-165.
4. Mustafina G.A., Bineeva F.N. (2007). Monitoring the assessment of the quality of a university lecture, Volzhsky. pp.1-2
5. Hattie J., Timperly H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research.77 (1): pp. 81–112.
6. McLaughlin M.W., Pfeifer R.S. (1988). Teacher Assessment: Improvement, Accountability and Effective Learning: ERIC;.
7. Penny AR, Coe R. (2004). Effectiveness of feedback consultation on student assessments: a meta-analysis. Review of educational research. 74 (2). pp. 215–53.
8. Knol M.H., In't Veld R., Vorst H.C.M., van Driel J.H., Mellenbergh G.J. (2013). Experimental effects of student assessments combined with collaborative counseling on the academic skills of college teachers. Research in Higher Education. 54(8). pp. 825-50.
9. Cohen P.A. (1980). Effectiveness of student rating feedback for improving college learning: a meta-analysis of outcomes. Research in Higher Education. 13 (4). pp. 321–41.
10. Knol, M. H., Dolan, C. V., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van der Maas, H. L. (2016). Measuring the quality of university lectures: Development and validation of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ). PloS one, 11(2), e0149163.