Political Science Law | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume07Issue12-06

Unregulated And Hybrid Transport Service Contracts: A Comparative Study Of Uzbekistan, Russia, Japan, The United States, Malaysia, And Other Jurisdictions

Nasirjon Ibragimovich Askarov , Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article examines unregulated and hybrid transport service contracts that have emerged in modern mobility ecosystems, including app-based taxi platforms (Yandex Go, MyTaxi), ride-sourcing, on-demand auxiliary services (battery jump-start, alcohol-free driver services), and car-sharing models (Delimobil, Zipcar, Times Car Plus). These services often combine multiple legal elements—transportation, agency, rental, consumer services, digital intermediation—and therefore do not neatly fit traditional legislative classifications. Because such contracts remain legally unnamed in many jurisdictions, including Uzbekistan, they create challenges in qualification, consumer protection, liability allocation, taxation, and regulatory oversight.

Drawing from civil-law theory (Ioffe, Braginsky, Butler, Piskov), international transport regulation, and comparative case studies, the article proposes a doctrinal understanding of hybrid transport contracts and provides practical recommendations for improving Uzbekistan’s legislative framework.

Keywords

Unregulated contracts, hybrid transport contracts, transport service agreements

References

Иоффе О. С.Обязательственное право. — М. : Юридическая литература, 1975. — 880 с.

Брагинский М. И., Витрянский В. В.Договорное право. Книга первая: Общие положения. — М. : Статут, 2005. — 847 с.

Лунц Л. А.Курс международного частного права. — М. : Спарк, 2002. — 624 с.

Писков К. А.Смешанные и непоименованные договоры в гражданском праве. — М. : Норма, 2014. — 312 с.

Butler W. E.Russian Law. — Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016. — 512 p.

Schaeffer E.Hybrid Contracts in Comparative Private Law // European Review of Private Law. — 2018. — Vol. 26, No. 3. — P. 421–445.

Uber Technologies Inc. v. City of Seattle, 2016 // United States Court of Appeals Records.

Transportation Network Company Regulation Act // California Public Utilities Code. — 2019.

Ministry of Transport Malaysia.Guidelines on E-Hailing Services. — Putrajaya, 2020.

Contract Act 1950 (Malaysia).

Transport Act 2010 (Malaysia).

Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part I–IV).

Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. — Tashkent, 2023.

Transport Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. — Tashkent, 2022.

Dubai Roads and Transport Authority (RTA).

Regulations on Ride-Hailing and Digital Mobility Services. — Dubai, 2021.

Times Mobility Co.Times Car Plus Service Terms and Conditions. — Tokyo, 2022.

OECD.Regulating Ride-Sourcing and Mobility Platforms. — Paris : OECD Publishing, 2021.

European Commission. Legal Challenges of the Platform Economy. — Brussels, 2020.

Grab Holdings Inc. Terms of Service and GrabPay User Agreement. — Singapore, 2023.

Yandex Go. User Agreement and Platform Rules. — Moscow, 2023.

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Nasirjon Ibragimovich Askarov. (2025). Unregulated And Hybrid Transport Service Contracts: A Comparative Study Of Uzbekistan, Russia, Japan, The United States, Malaysia, And Other Jurisdictions. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 7(12), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume07Issue12-06