Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: Comparative models of education legislation: an analytical overview
Shokhjakhon Khujayev , Head of Department at Tashkent state university of law, UzbekistanAbstract
Legislation is a living organism: it develops and adapts over time. Its effectiveness is determined not merely by the number of enacted provisions but by their quality, internal coherence, and fitness for purpose. Among fundamental human rights entrenched in nearly all constitutions and statutory systems is the right to education. Yet comparative practice shows that the improvement of education law admits no single, universal template. Each State calibrates legal design to its socio-economic trajectory and its political-legal traditions and values.
Keywords
References
U.S. Constitution, Tenth Amendment.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA).
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004.
Strengthening Career and Technical Education for the 21st Century Act.
Compulsory education laws (state-level variation)—ECS/NCES overviews.
United Kingdom: Education Act 1996; DfE statutory guidance practice.
Finland: Constitution, Section 16 (right to education).
Japan: Basic Act on Education (Act No. 120 of 2006).
Singapore: Education Act 1957.
Code de l’éducation (Ordonnance n° 2000-549).
Model Education Code of CIS.
Decree of President of the Republic of Uzbekistan PF-5505 (8 Aug. 2018) approving the Concept for Improving Rule-Making.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shokhjakhon Khujayev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.