Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: Improving judicial mechanisms for eliminating pre-trial procedural errors in the criminal process of Uzbekistan
Otkir Abdugaffarovich Mamadaliev , Independent researcher at Supreme School of Judges under the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of UzbekistanAbstract
This article addresses the systemic issues of procedural errors in the pre-trial phase of criminal proceedings in Uzbekistan. The research focuses on the theoretical nature of such errors, their classification, and their implications for judicial fairness and legal integrity. Drawing from domestic legal norms, empirical data, and comparative international practice, the article proposes reforms for strengthening judicial mechanisms to detect and eliminate these errors effectively. The goal is to enhance procedural safeguards and ensure compliance with fundamental rights during criminal prosecution.
Keywords
Procedural errors, criminal justice, pre-trial investigation
References
Golovko, L.V. (2009). Istoki i perspektivy instituta dopolnitelnogo rassledovaniya ugolovnykh del na postsovetskom prostranstve [Origins and Prospects of the Supplementary Investigation Institution in the Post-Soviet Space]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, No. 11, p. 54.
Voskobitova, L.A. (2004). Mekhanizm realizatsii sudebnoy vlasti posredstvom ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Mechanism for Implementing Judicial Power through Criminal Proceedings]. Doctoral dissertation in law, Moscow.
Davudova, D. (2020). Issues of Improving Prosecutorial Powers in the First Instance Criminal Proceedings. PhD dissertation abstract, Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent.
Bagmet, A.M., Ismanova, N.V. (2020). Chto sdelat' zakonodatelyu dlya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakona [What the Legislator Should Do to Improve Criminal Procedural Law]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, No. 3, p. 14.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2022). Resolution No. 6 of May 14, 2022 “On Judicial Practice of Preparing Criminal Cases for Trial in the Court of First Instance.”
Fayziev, Sh., Sattarova, S. (2017). Elimination of the Institution of Returning a Case for Supplementary Investigation. Monograph. 117 pp.
Trisheva, A.A. (2017). Returning a Criminal Case to the Prosecutor in Russian Criminal Procedure. Moscow: Prospect. 70 pp.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Otkir Abdugaffarovich Mamadaliev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.