The role of the prosecutor in the criminal justice system is imbued with significant power and discretion, influencing charging decisions, plea bargains, and ultimately, the perception of defendant culpability. While extensive research has explored factors affecting juror and public perceptions of guilt, the impact of the prosecutor's gender remains an underexplored area. This article investigates how the gender of a prosecutor might influence perceptions of a defendant's culpability, drawing upon theories of gender stereotypes and role congruity. Through a comprehensive literature review, we examine the powerful role of prosecutors, the mechanisms of culpability perception, and the broader effects of gender in professional and legal contexts. This review outlines a hypothetical experimental design to empirically test this relationship, discussing potential findings and their implications for fairness, bias, and professional development within the legal system. Understanding these gender dynamics is crucial for fostering a more equitable and just legal process.

Prosecutor Gender, Defendant Culpability, Perceptions, Criminal Justice, Gender Stereotypes

Alschuler, A. W. (1976). The Trial Judge’s Role in Plea Bargaining, Part I. Columbia Law Review, 76, 1059-1154. https://doi.org/10.2307/1121673

American Bar Association. (2022). ABA profile of the legal profession. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/news/2022/07/profile-report-2022.pdf

Barron, L. A. (2003). Ask and you shall Receive? Gender Differences in Negotiators’ Beliefs about Requests for a Higher Salary. Human Relations (New York), 56(6), 635–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267030566001

Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2000). The war on crime as hegemonic strategy: A neo-Marxian theory of the new punitiveness in US criminal justice policy. In Of crime & criminality: The use of theory in everyday life (pp. 61-84). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors' evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law & Human Behavior, 19, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499074

Bibas, S. (2009). Prosecutorial regulation versus prosecutorial accountability. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 154(4), 959–1016. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/244

Blank Law. (2022). Why hire a female criminal defense lawyer for sex crime cases. https://nicoleblankbecker.com/why-hire-a-female-criminal-defense-lawyer-for-sex-crime-cases/#:~:text=Many%20psychological%20studies%20have%20shown,may%20not%20be%20able%20to

Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Claiming authority: Negotiating challenges for women leaders. The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611406-16

Bresler, K. (1996). “I never lost a trial”: When prosecutors keep score of criminal convictions. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 9(2), 537–546. http://hdl.handle.net/10822/898654

Brooklyn Defender Services. (2018). In defense of power of prosecutors. https://indefenseof.us/issues/prosecuted

Burke, A. S. (2006). Improving prosecutorial decision making: some lessons of cognitive science. William and Mary Law Review, 47(5), 1587–1634. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=wmlr

Claessens, S., Fischer, K., Chaudhuri, A., Sibley, C. G., & Atkinson, Q. D. (2020). The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9

Davis, A. J. (2007). Arbitrary justice: The power of the American prosecutor. Oxford University Press.

Dervan, L. E., and V. A. Edkins. 2013. “The Innocent Defendant’s Dilemma: An Innovative Empirical Study of Plea Bargaining’s Innocence Problem.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 103(1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2071397

Devers, L. (2011). Plea and charge bargaining: Research summary. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/pleabargainingresearchsummary.pdf

Dolan, K. (2010). The impact of gender stereotyped evaluations on support for women candidates. Political Behavior, 32, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9090-4

Eagly, A. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In D. van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–93). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216170.n7

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Flanagan, T. J., McGarrell, E. F., & Brown, E. J. (1985). Public perceptions of the criminal courts: The role of demographic and related attitudinal variables. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427885022001004

Fox, B., Moule, R. K., Jaynes, C. M., & Parry, M. M. (2021). Are the Effects of Legitimacy and Its Components Invariant? Operationalization and the Generality of Sunshine and Tyler’s Empowerment Hypothesis. The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820926228

Francis, L. J. (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1996.0066

Frazier, A., and J. E. Gonzales. 2021. “Studying Sequential Processes of Criminal Defendant Decision-Making Using a Choose-Your-Own-Adventure Research Paradigm.” Psychology, Crime & Law 28(9): 883–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2021.1972107

Funk, K. D. (2019). If the shoe fits: Gender role congruity and evaluations of public managers. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(1), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.21.48

Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1

Hahn, P.W., & Clayton, S.D. (1996). The effects of attorney presentation style, attorney gender, and juror gender on juror decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 20(5), 533–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499040

Hellgren, J., & Kassin, S. M. (2022). The defense lawyer’s plea recommendation: Disentangling the influences of perceived guilt and probability of conviction. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 28(4), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000365

Hodgson, S. & Pryor, B. (1984). Sex discrimination in the courtroom: Attorney’s gender and credibility. Psychological Reports, 55(2), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1984.55.2.483

Hong, A. P. C. I., & van der Wijst, P. J. (2013). Women in negotiation: Effects of gender and power on negotiation behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6(4), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12022

Hurwitz, M. S., & Lanier, D. N. (2008). Diversity in state and federal appellate courts: Change and continuity across 20 years. Justice System Journal, 29(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2008.10767870