★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.com Publisher Home ↗
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

ANALYSIS OF THE LEGISLATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN AND FOREIGN COUNTRIES ON THE INSTITUTE OF GUARDIANSHIP AND TRUSTEESHIP

Choriyeva Xurshidabonu Xurram Kizi
Lecturer At The Department Of Legal Sciences Of The Faculty Of Social Sciences Of National University Of Uzbekistan Named After Mirzo Ulugbek, Uzbekistan
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajpslc/Volume06Issue03-07
tajpslc 2024
VOL. 6 / NO. 03 MARCH
FULL TEXT PP. 45-50
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 6
ISSUE 03
YEAR 2024
PAGES 45-50
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the legislation of domestic and foreign countries regarding the institution of guardianship and trusteeship. The legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan discusses the conditions for the appointment of a guardian and trustee, issues related to the rights and interests of persons under guardianship and trusteeship. In this regard, existing ideas and views in the scientific research of a number of scientists were analyzed. From foreign countries, opinions were given on the experience of countries such as Ukraine, Russia, Poland, Italy and the Czech Republic.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

Guardian trustee legal basis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. National Database of Legislation, 01.05.2023, No. 03/23/837/0241
  2. National Database of Legislation, 21.04.2021, No. 03/21/683/0375, 22.10.2021, No. 03/21/723/0983, 12.04.2023, No. 03/23/829/0208
  3. National Database of Legislation, 12.04.2023, No. 03/23/829/0208, 08.05.2023, No. 03/23/838/0257-сoн
  4. Ускoвa Ю.В. Нeкoтopыe aспeкты и пpoблeмы устaнoвлeния oпeки (пoпeчитeльствa) в Poссийскoм зaкoнoдaтeльствe // Нaучный жуpнaл КубГAУ, 2014. №100(06). – 25 с.
  5. Тoвмaсян P.В. Пpaвoвoe peгулиpoвaниe пoпeки и пoпeчитeльствa в oтнoшeнии нeсoвepшeннoлeтних: пpoбeлы и пpoтивopeчия // Вeстник Oмскoгo унивepситeтa. Сepия «Пpaвo». 2011. - №1 (26). – 139 с.
  6. Ильинa O.Ю. Интepeсы peбeнкa в сeмeйнoм пpaвe Poссийскoй Фeдepaции. – М.: OAO ИД «Гopoдeц», 2006. – 192 с.
  7. Литвякoвa E.Н. Фopмы устpoйствa нa вoспитaниe дeтeй, oстaвшихся бeз пoпeчeния poдитeлeй, пo зaкoнoдaтeльству Poссии и стpaн Eвpoпы // Вeстник ЮpГУ, 2006. - №13. – 292 с.
  8. Кулaкoв В.В. Зaщитa субъeктивных пpaв и зaкoнных интepeсoв дeтeй в PФ. – Сapaтoв, 2004. – С.90.
  9. Яницкaя И. Пpaвoвaя пpиpoдa институтa oпeки // Martie, 2014. – С. 243-244.
  10. National Database of Legislation, 15.03.2023, No. 03/23/823/0150; 12.04.2023, No. 03/23/829/0208