Engineering and Technology
| Open Access |
DOI: Mathematical Model Of Closed-Loop Aerodynamic Tube
Asanov Seyran , Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan Umerov Fikret , Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent, Uzbekistan Pulatov Takhirjan , Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent, UzbekistanAbstract
This study explores a closed‑loop aerodynamic tube that recirculates air to create stable, repeatable flow conditions in a laboratory setting. In this configuration, a fan continuously drives air through a closed duct, past a central test section where measurements and experiments are carried out, and then back to the fan inlet. The closed loop reduces the impact of ambient disturbances and helps maintain the desired flow with relatively modest energy use. The test section is designed with a nearly constant cross‑sectional area so that the velocity field is as uniform as possible, which simplifies both instrumentation and data interpretation. Upstream, a contraction accelerates and conditions the flow, while downstream diffusers and curved ducts gently slow and redirect the air, preserving flow quality as it recirculates. Taken together, these features provide a compact and efficient platform for high‑fidelity aerodynamic testing and control‑oriented studies of internal flows.
Keywords
losed‑loop aerodynamic tube, wind tunnel, recirculating airflow
References
Arjune GC, Bhivsane SV. Design and Simulation of Wind Tunnel Using CFD Analysis, 2021, p. 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8304-9_3.
Downie JH, Jordinson R, Barnes FH. On the design of three-dimensional wind tunnel contractions. The Aeronautical Journal 1984;88:287–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000020698.
O’Connor JP, Haji-Sheikh A. Numerical study of film cooling in supersonic flow. AIAA Journal 1992;30:2426–33. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11243.
Potsis T, Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T. Computational wind engineering: 30 years of research progress in building structures and environment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 2023;234:105346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105346.
Calautit JK, Hughes BR. CFD and experimental data of closed-loop wind tunnel flow. Data Brief 2016;7:216–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.033.
Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal 1994;32:1598–605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.
Cheah SC, Iacovides H, Jackson DC, Ji H, Launder BE. Experimental investigation of enclosed rotor-stator disk flows. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1994;9:445–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0894-1777(94)90022-1.
Ainegren M, Tuplin S, Carlsson P, Render P. Design and development of a climatic wind tunnel for physiological sports experimentation. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sport Eng Technol 2019;233:86–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754337118801729.
Denne J, Rocha J. Aerodynamic Characterization of a Wind Tunnel Using Experimental and Computational Methods. J Aircr 2024;61:1837–46. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C037671.
Adamu ZA, Price ADF, Cook MJ. Performance evaluation of natural ventilation strategies for hospital wards – A case study of Great Ormond Street Hospital. Build Environ 2012;56:211–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.011.
Coutanceau M, Bouard R. Experimental determination of the main features of the viscous flow in the wake of a circular cylinder in uniform translation. Part 1. Steady flow. J Fluid Mech 1977;79:231–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112077000135.
Cassetti G, Bellina MC, Colombo E. Correlating Quantitative Risk Assessment and Exergy Analysis for Accounting Inefficiency in Process Hazards: A Case Study. J Energy Resour Technol 2018;140. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039617.
Navruzov DP, Madaliev ME, Pulatov TR, Juraev SR, Boltayev SA. Direct numerical simulation of flow in a flat channel with a rectangular step based on the nonstationary Navier-Stokes equations, 2023, p. 030007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0135306.
Madaliev E, Madaliev M, Adilov K, Pulatov T. Comparison of turbulence models for two-phase flow in a centrifugal separator. E3S Web of Conferences 2021;264:01009. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401009.
WTTECHCZ. www.wttech.cz/en/wind-tunnels/small-wind-tunnels/closed-circuit/ n.d.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asanov Seyran, Umerov Fikret, Pulatov Takhirjan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.