★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Agriculture and Biomedical OPEN ACCESS

Evaluation of The Growth-Stimulating Potential of Salt-Tolerant Bacteria Isolated from Saline Soils

Zakiryaeva S.I.
Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Karimov H.Kh.
Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Isokulov M.Z.
Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Abdukarimova I.A.
National University of Uzbekistan
Ergasheva Z.M.
National University of Uzbekistan
Khamidova H.M.
Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan
tajabe 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 05 MAY
VOLUME 8
ISSUE 05
YEAR 2026
PAGES 6-10

Abstract

The growth-stimulating potential of four salt-tolerant Bacillus strains (B. subtilis 7А, 9А, 10А and B. proteolyticus 33S) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was studied in vitro. Seed inoculation with the strains significantly increased germination, shoot and root length, as well as fresh and dry weight compared to the control. The most pronounced growth-promoting effect was observed with the B. proteolyticus 33S strain, which increased shoot length by 4.9 cm, root length by 2.72 cm, fresh weight by 0.20 g, and dry weight by 0.03 g relative to the control. The obtained results allow us to recommend the studied strains for further research with the aim of their future use in microbial biopreparations aimed at stimulating plant growth and improving the properties of saline soils.

Keywords

Salinity Bacillus salt-tolerance

References

  1. Eva van Zelm,Yanxia Zhang,Christa Testerink (2020). Salt Tolerance Mechanisms of Plants Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 71. Р. 403–33.
  2. Rengasamy P. (2006).World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J. Exp. Bot.57. Р. 1017–23.
  3. Munns R., Tester M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59. Р. 651–81.
  4. Arzani A., Ashraf M. (2016) Smart engineering of genetic resources for enhanced salinity tolerance in crop plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 35(3). Р. 146–189.
  5. Backer R., Rokem J.S., Ilangumaran G., Lamont J., Praslickova D., Ricci E., Subramanian S., Smith D.L. (2018). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci., 9. P. 1473. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01473
  6. 6.Buntić A.V., Stajković-Srbinović O., Knežević M.M., Rasulić N.I., Kuzmanović D.Ž., Dimitrijević-Branković S.I., Delić D.I. (2019). The effect of bacterial isolates from rhizosphere soils on wheat and barley seed germination.Zemljišteibiljka,Vol. 68, No. 2.Р. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5934/ZemBilj1902001B
  7. Fahad S., Hussain S., BanoA., Saud S., Hassan S., Shan D.et al (2015). Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.22.Р.4907–4921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2
  8. Gupta G., PariharS.S., AhirwarN.K., SnehiS.K., SinghV. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J. Microb. Biochem.Technol. 7(2).Р.096–102. http://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000188
  9. Vacheron J., Desbrosses G., Bouffaud M.L., Touraine B., Moenne-Loccoz Y., Muller D. et al (2013). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front. Plant Sci.4:356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356
  10. Ruzzi M., Aroca R. (2015). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria act as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. 196. Р. 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.042
  11. Li N., Li J., Zhang S., Lan X., Zhou H. (2025). Unveiling the microbial mysteries of mulberry rhizosphere in saline-alkaline soils.Rhizosphere33, 10.Р. 10-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101040
  12. Ou T. et al. (2023). Study on the potential for stimulating mulberry growth and drought tolerance of plant growth-promoting fungi. IJMS 24(4), Р. 40-90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24044090
  13. Zakiryaeva S.I., KarimovH.Kh., Khamidova X.M., Shakirov Z.S. Assessment of salt tolerance of soil bacterial isolates isolated from various soil-climatic conditions. "Actual problems of development of bioorganic chemistry": conference proceedings (September 9–10, 2025). Tashkent, 2025. P. 527–528.
  14. Zvyagintsev D.G. Methods of soil microbiology and biochemistry. Moscow, 1991. 350 p.
  15. Chukwuneme C.F., Babalola O.O., Kutu F.R., Ojuederie O.B. (2020). Characterization of actinomycetes isolates for plant growth promoting traits and their effects on drought tolerance in maize. J. Plant Interact. 15(1): Р. 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2020.1752833
  16. Glickmann E., Dessaux Y. (1995) Aсritical examination of the specificity of the Salkowski reagent for indolic compounds produced by phytopathogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 61, Р. 793–796. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.2.793-796.1995
  17. Larkin M.A., Blackshields G., Brown N.P., Chenna R., McGettigan P.A., McWilliam H., Valentin F., Wallace I.M., Wilm A., Lopez R., Thompson J.D., Gibson T.J., Higgins D.G., Clustal W. (2007). Clustal X version 2.0.Bioinformatics, 23. Р. 2947-2948.
  18. Luqman M., Ahmad M., Dar A., Hussain A., Zulfiqar U., Mumtaz M.Z., Mustafa A., Mustafa AE-ZMA, Elshikh M.S. (2025) PGPR and nutrient consortia promoted cotton growth, antioxidant enzymes, and mineral uptake by suppressing sooty mold in arid climate. Front. Microbiol. 16:1551465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1551465
  19. Ratnaningsih H.R., Noviana Z., Dewi T.K., Loekito S., Wiyono S., Gafur A., Antonius S. (2023). IAA and ACC deaminase producing-bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of pineapple plants grown under different abiotic and biotic stresses. Heliyon. 9(6): e16306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16306