The Importance of The Organization of Turkish States in Turkey's Relations with Central Asian States
Abstract
This article examines the strategic function performed by the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) in Türkiye’s Central Asia policy in light of institutional developments between 2021 and 2026. It aims to identify the organization’s internal capabilities, external environment, and capacity to deepen cooperation between Türkiye and the Central Asian states. Within a qualitative case-study design, official declarations, strategic documents, reports by international organizations, and peer-reviewed scholarship are assessed through document analysis and process tracing. SWOT factors are coded across political-institutional, trade-transport, energy, security, and cultural-humanitarian dimensions and converted into strategic combinations through a TOWS matrix. The findings identify shared identity, Trans-Caspian connectivity, and a networked institutional ecosystem as the organization’s principal strengths, while consensus-based governance, limited intra-organizational trade, logistical bottlenecks, and divergent foreign-policy orientations constrain implementation capacity. Its theoretical contribution is the model of “selective functional institutionalization”, identity generates political trust, whereas sustainable outcomes depend on specific regimes, measurable indicators, and shared ownership among member states.
Keywords
Türkiye, Central Asia, Organization of Turkic States
References
Akıllı, E. (2019). TURKSOY, Turkic Council and cultural diplomacy: Transactionalism revisited. Bilig, 91, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9101
Alaranta, T., & Silvan, K. (2022). Turkey in Central Asia: Possibilities and limits of a greater role (FIIA Briefing Paper No. 328). Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
Avcu, S. A. (2025). Evaluation of the Organization of the Turkic States in the light of integration theories. ADAM Academy Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1645742
Çetinkaya, A. F., & Demirel, N. (2024). Analyzing the impact of the Organization of Turkic States on the foreign trade of member countries. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2288370. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2288370
Demir, C. (2022). The Organization of Turkic States: Implications for the regional balance of power. Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 39–71. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1104776
Emeklier, B., Taş, T., & Yılmaz, K. Ç. (2022). Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı: Bütünleşme sürecine nereden başlamalı ve ne yapmalı? Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi, 73–107. https://doi.org/10.17752/guvenlikstrtj.1112874
Helms, M. M., & Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis—Where are we now? A review of academic research from the last decade. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
Musabay Baki, P. (2022). Turkic World Vision–2040: A step forward for the resilience of Turkic cooperation. Perceptions, 27(1), 26–52.
OECD. (2023). Realising the potential of the Middle Corridor. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/635ad854-en
OECD. (2025). Enhancing the competitiveness of the Trans-Caspian Transport Corridor in Central Asia. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f261e7fa-en
Organization of Turkic States. (2009). Nakhchivan Agreement on the establishment of the Cooperation Council of Turkic Speaking States.
Organization of Turkic States. (2021a). Turkic World Vision 2040.
Organization of Turkic States. (2025a). Organization chart: Member and observer states.
Organization of Turkic States. (2025b). Gabala Declaration of the 12th Summit of the Organization of Turkic States.
Organization of Turkic States. (n.d.-a). Presidential summits.
Organization of Turkic States. (n.d.-b). Turkic cooperation organizations.
President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2025, March 31). The leaders of Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan signed the Treaty on the Junction Point of the State Borders.
Salihi, E. A., & Mehmetcik, H. (2025). Institutionalization of relationship and voting cohesion: Organization of Turkic States at the UN General Assembly. Bilig, 112, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.7668
Turkic Academy. (2024, September 11). Common Turkic alphabet approved.
United Nations. (2025, March 14). Secretary-General welcomes Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan border treaty.
Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0
World Bank. (2023). Middle Trade and Transport Corridor: Policies and investments to triple freight volumes and halve travel time by 2030. World Bank.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Japparov Shuhrat Gapparovich

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: