Political Science Law
| Open Access |
DOI: Issues of Adherence to Procedural Deadlines in The Course of Judicial Digitalization
Odilova Sitora Bobir qizi , Independent Researcher at Tashkent State Law University, UzbekistanAbstract
This article provides a scientific analysis of the issues in adhering to procedural deadlines during the digitalization of the judicial system. Organizing court proceedings based on digital technologies is expected to increase the efficiency of justice, yet problems persist in reviewing cases and issuing decisions within prescribed time frames. The authors examine the experience of implementing electronic justice systems (E-Sud, Sud.uz, sud.ijro.uz, etc.) in Uzbekistan’s judiciary, identifying shortcomings in compliance with procedural timelines. Drawing on international experience and recommendations (COSCA, CEPEJ, etc.), the article proposes solutions to address these pressing issues and to ensure timely adjudication of court cases.
Keywords
Procedural deadlines, digitalization, e-justice
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Farmoni (PF–6127-son, 07.12.2020) – “Sudyalarning chinakam mustaqilligini ta’minlash va sud tizimida korrupsiyaning oldini olish samaradorligini oshirish to‘g‘risida” (O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 7-dekabrdagi farmoni).
“Raqamli O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasi – O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 5-oktabrdagi farmoni bilan tasdiqlangan raqamli iqtisodiyot va elektron hukumatni rivojlantirish strategiyasi.
Bazarova D. (2025) – “Raqamlashtirish sudlar faoliyatida ochiqlik va shaffoflikni oshiradi”. Yuz.uz axborot portali, 2025-yil 5-iyun .
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PF–4459-son Farmoni (02.08.2012) va VM Qarori 346-son (10.12.2012) – Sudlar faoliyatiga zamonaviy AKT joriy etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risidagi hujjatlar.
“E-SUD” milliy elektron sudlov axborot tizimi – Oliy sud va BMT Taraqqiyot Dasturi hamkorligida 2013-yilda joriy etilgan tizim. Zangiota tumanlararo sudida buyruq tartibidagi ishlarni to‘liq avtomatlashtirish tajribasi.
Pirmatov O.Sh. (2022) – “Elektron fuqarolik ishi (E-SUD) tizimida sud ishlarini boshqarish”. Yurisprudensiya ilmiy jurnali, №5/2022. (Maqolada O‘zbekiston Fuqarolik protsessual kodeksiga kiritilgan elektron sud ishini yuritish normalari, xususan FPK 5-moddasi tahlil qilingan).
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi “Sud hujjatlari va boshqa organlar hujjatlarini ijro etish to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni – sud hujjatlarini elektron shaklda yuborish va ijro etish tartibi to‘g‘risidagi norma (2021-yilgi o‘zgartirishlar).
CEPEJ (2018) – Sudlar samaradorligi bo‘yicha Yevropa komissiyasining sud jarayonlari vaqtini boshqarish yuzasidan “SATURN Qo‘llanmasi” (3-tahrir). Ushbu hujjatda protsessual muddatlarni rejalashtirish va nazorat qilish bo‘yicha tavsiyalar berilgan.
Civil Justice Initiative (USA, 2016) – AQSh Milliy Sud Markazi tomonidan tayyorlangan “Fuqarolik adliya tizimini takomillashtirish bo‘yicha chaqiriq” hisobotidan tavsiyalar. Unda sud ishlarini boshqaruvchi dasturlar orqali muddatlarni avtomatik nazorat qilish va kechikishlarni oldini olish zarurligi ta’kidlangan .
CCJ/COSCA Post-Pandemic Court Technology Principles (2020) – AQSh Oliy sudyalar konferensiyasi va Davlat sud ma’murlari konferensiyasining pandemiyadan keyingi davrda sud texnologiyalarini qo‘llash bo‘yicha qo‘shma prinsiplari. Ushbu prinsiplar sud jarayonlarida texnologiyalarni qo‘llashda odil sudlovning tezkorlik va adolatlilik tamoyillariga rioya etishni nazarda tutadi
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Odilova Sitora Bobir qizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.