★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Political Science Law OPEN ACCESS

The Concept Of Control In Uzbek Corporate Law

Utkirbek Kholmirzaev
Lecturer Of Tashkent State University Of Law, Uzbekistan
tajpslc 2021
VOL. 3 / NO. 12 DECEMBER
VOLUME 3
ISSUE 12
YEAR 2021
PAGES 63-67

Abstract

This article discusses the concept of control and its implications for the distribution of corporate risks. The analysis of the meaning and state of the concept of control in Uzbek law is given. Also, the problems of establishing control in subsidiaries in the constituent documents and subordination agreements are considered. The question was raised: what amount of participation in the company gives the right to control and how control is determined if there is no formal reflection (in the constituent documents or agreements)? The responsibility of the controlling person is recognized as the main goal of the concept, because control determines the actual relationship between the society and the controlling person and explains the responsibility of the decision-maker.

Keywords

Uzbekistan Uzbek Law Concept Of Control Subsidiary Joint And Several Liability Creditor

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Adolf A. Berle, Jr. "Control" in Coṛporate Law. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 8, Columbia University School of Law: 1858-1958. 1958 (Dec., 1958), pp. 1212-1225. С. 1212.
  2. Гражданский кодекс Республики Узбекистан. Ведомости Олий Мажлиса Республики Узбекистан, 1996 г., приложение к № 2. https://lex.uz/docs/111181#156515.
  3. Налоговый кодекс Республики Узбекистан. Национальная база данных законодательства, 31.12.2019 г., № 02/19/НК/4256; 11.03.2020 г., № 03/20/607/0279, 05.10.2020 г., № 03/20/640/1348.
  4. Научно-практический комментарий к части первой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации для предпринимателей/Под ред. В.Д. Карповича. М., 1999. С. 194.
  5. Шиткина И.С. Основания установления холдинговых отношений // Предпринимательское право. – 2005. – № 2. СПС «КонсультантПлюс».
  6. Гулямов С.С. «Проблемные вопросы ответственности в дочернем акционерном обществе». Вестник Российского экономического университета им. Г.В. Плеханова, no. 2, 2005, pp. 71-80. С. 76.
  7. Oh P.B. Veil-Piercing // Texas Law Review. 2010. Vol. 89. Р. 90.
  8. Флейшиц Е.А. Курс советского гражданского права. Обязательства из причинения вреда и из неосновательного обогащения. М., 1951. С. 6.
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.