Medical Science
| Open Access |
DOI: Advances and Current Evidence in Minimally Invasive Hepatobiliary Surgery: A Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches
Xudayberganova Nasiba Shakirovna , PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan Erkinov Javohir Abdulhamid ugli , Master’s degree, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan Irisov Ortiqali Tulayevich , DSc, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan Mardonov Jamshid Normurotovich , PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Tashkent State Medical University, Uzbekistan Khalikulov Khusan Gazihanovich , PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery and Transplantology, Tashkent State Medical University, UzbekistanAbstract
The field of hepatobiliary surgery is undergoing a significant paradigm shift, transitioning from conventional open approaches toward increasingly sophisticated minimally invasive techniques, including laparoscopic and robotic surgery. This review critically examines the contemporary evidence supporting minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS), tracing its progression from minor resections to complex oncologic procedures and applications in liver transplantation. Current data consistently demonstrate that laparoscopic and robotic liver resections are associated with improved short-term perioperative outcomes compared with open surgery. These benefits include reduced intraoperative blood loss, lower transfusion requirements, and shorter lengths of hospital stay. Importantly, in both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies—such as hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases—MILS achieves oncological outcomes equivalent to open surgery, with comparable rates of margin negativity, recurrence, and long-term survival. The advent of robotic-assisted surgery represents a further evolution in MILS, addressing several technical constraints of conventional laparoscopy. Enhanced three-dimensional visualization, tremor suppression, and articulated instrumentation facilitate precise dissection and suturing, particularly in technically demanding hepatectomies, including resections of posterosuperior segments and complex staged procedures such as associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS). These advantages may translate into reduced operative difficulty and physiological stress in selected patients. Despite its growing adoption and recognition as a standard approach in high-volume centers, the widespread implementation of MILS remains limited by cost considerations, unequal access to advanced technology, and a steep learning curve. This review concludes that while minimally invasive liver surgery is firmly established, further high-quality randomized controlled trials and standardized training pathways are essential to optimize outcomes, ensure oncological rigor, and promote safe global dissemination of these techniques.
Keywords
Minimally invasive liver surgery, Laparoscopic hepatectomy, Robotic liver surgery
References
Beal, E. W., & Tsung, A. (2023). Minimally invasive hepatectomy is here to stay, but more evidence is needed. HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 12(4), 619–621.
Chen, H. K., Chang, K. C., Shao, S. C., Soong, R. S., Chen, Y. C., Wu, C. F., et al. (2025). Effectiveness of minimally invasive hepatectomy in patients with early or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-institutional cohort study in an Asian population. Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, 12, 879–890.
de Hondt, J., Zwart, M. J. W., Uijterwijk, B. A., Burchell, G. L., Görgeç, B., Zonderhuis, B., et al. (2025). Minimally invasive liver surgery for perihilar and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Surgical Endoscopy, 39, 7141–7159.
Dincer, H. A., & Dogrul, A. B. (2024). Advances in minimally invasive liver surgery. North Clin Istanb, 11(6), 586–592.
Falls, S. J., Maxwell, C. M., Kaye, D. J., Dighe, S. G., Schiffman, S. C., Bartlett, D. L., et al. (2024). Minimally invasive hepatopancreatobiliary surgery at a large regional health system: Assessing the safety of program expansion. The American Surgeon, 90(1), 85–91.
Hu, J., Yue, W., & Zhang, T. (2024). Application and effect evaluation of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of hepatobiliary diseases. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research, 8(2), 258–262.
Imtiaz, S., & Sheikh, M. R. (2025). Advances in minimally invasive liver surgery: Comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches. HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition, 14(1), 163–165.
Khan, M. A., Salman, M., Yu, X., Rashed, M., Baig, A. A., & Zhao, H. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques in the management of hepatobiliary cysts: Outcomes and complications. Health Affairs, 11, 1948–1954.
Loke, S., Ding Chao Ong, B., Ng, J., & Kow, A. W. C. (2025). Safety and efficacy of minimally invasive associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery, 111, 2283–2290.
Sijberden, J. P., Cipriani, F., Lanari, J., Russolillo, N., Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., Osei-Bordom, D., et al. (2023). Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly: International multicentre propensity score-matched study. BJS, 110, 927–930.
Zhang, C. Z., & Li, N. (2020). Advances in minimally invasive surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatoma Research, 6, 77.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xudayberganova Nasiba Shakirovna, Erkinov Javohir Abdulhamid ugli, Irisov Ortiqali Tulayevich, Mardonov Jamshid Normurotovich, Khalikulov Khusan Gazihanovich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.