Articles
| Open Access |
DOI: Modern strategies in neurorehabilitation following stroke
E.M. Mirjurayev , Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan J.A. Nazarova , Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan M.A. Bakhadirova , Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan J.H. Akilov , Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan L.A. Shadmanova , Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of UzbekistanAbstract
Stroke remains one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Despite advancements in acute stroke management, many survivors experience residual impairments that significantly reduce their quality of life. Modern strategies in neurorehabilitation aim to leverage technological innovations and interdisciplinary approaches to maximize functional recovery. This article reviews the current evidence-based strategies, including robotics, virtual reality, brain-computer interfaces, and tele-rehabilitation, as well as personalized, patient-centered therapy plans. The discussion highlights clinical outcomes, challenges in implementation, and future directions in post-stroke neurorehabilitation.
Keywords
Stroke rehabilitation, neuroplasticity, virtual reality
References
Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., et al. (2014). Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2
Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke, 47(6), e98–e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
Wolf, S. L., et al. (2006). Effect of CIMT on upper extremity function after stroke: The EXCITE trial. JAMA, 296(17), 2095–2104.
Mehrholz, J., et al. (2018). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10).
Laver, K. E., et al. (2017). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11).
Cramer, S. C., et al. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591–1609.
Bernhardt, J., et al. (2015). Efficacy and safety of early mobilisation post-stroke: AVERT trial. The Lancet, 386(9988), 46–55.
Veerbeek, J. M., et al. (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? PLoS ONE, 9(2), e87987.
Hackett, M. L., & Pickles, K. (2014). Depression after stroke: A systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 9(8), 1017–1025.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 E.M. Mirjurayev, J.A. Nazarova, M.A. Bakhadirova, J.H. Akilov, L.A. Shadmanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.