★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Medical Science OPEN ACCESS

Modern strategies in neurorehabilitation following stroke

E.M. Mirjurayev
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan
J.A. Nazarova
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan
M.A. Bakhadirova
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan
J.H. Akilov
Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan
L.A. Shadmanova
Center for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers under the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan
tajmspr 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 04 APRIL
VOLUME 7
ISSUE 04
YEAR 2025
PAGES 16-20

Abstract

Stroke remains one of the leading causes of long-term disability worldwide. Despite advancements in acute stroke management, many survivors experience residual impairments that significantly reduce their quality of life. Modern strategies in neurorehabilitation aim to leverage technological innovations and interdisciplinary approaches to maximize functional recovery. This article reviews the current evidence-based strategies, including robotics, virtual reality, brain-computer interfaces, and tele-rehabilitation, as well as personalized, patient-centered therapy plans. The discussion highlights clinical outcomes, challenges in implementation, and future directions in post-stroke neurorehabilitation.

Keywords

Stroke rehabilitation neuroplasticity virtual reality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Langhorne, P., Bernhardt, J., & Kwakkel, G. (2011). Stroke rehabilitation. The Lancet, 377(9778), 1693–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
  2. Pollock, A., Farmer, S. E., Brady, M. C., et al. (2014). Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2
  3. Winstein, C. J., Stein, J., Arena, R., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery. Stroke, 47(6), e98–e169. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000098
  4. Wolf, S. L., et al. (2006). Effect of CIMT on upper extremity function after stroke: The EXCITE trial. JAMA, 296(17), 2095–2104.
  5. Mehrholz, J., et al. (2018). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10).
  6. Laver, K. E., et al. (2017). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (11).
  7. Cramer, S. C., et al. (2011). Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications. Brain, 134(6), 1591–1609.
  8. Bernhardt, J., et al. (2015). Efficacy and safety of early mobilisation post-stroke: AVERT trial. The Lancet, 386(9988), 46–55.
  9. Veerbeek, J. M., et al. (2014). What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? PLoS ONE, 9(2), e87987.
  10. Hackett, M. L., & Pickles, K. (2014). Depression after stroke: A systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 9(8), 1017–1025.
CONTINUE EXPLORING

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Explore other published research by the authors of this article.