Engineering and Technology | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume08Issue04-03

Comparative Analysis of RAG Algorithms and LLM Fine-Tuning Methods for Domain-Specific Search Tasks

Kapil Verma , Software Engineer, Google, Mountain View, CA, USA

Abstract

The article examines the comparative properties of Retrieval-Augmented Generation algorithms and large-language-model fine-tuning methods in the context of domain-specific search tasks with a high cost of error. The aim is to identify operating regimes in which RAG and fine-tuning differentially affect the accuracy of top-ranked results, the evidential quality of answers, and the safety of handling sensitive data. The relevance of the study is driven by the rapid growth of industrial domain-specific search systems that must simultaneously ensure knowledge updatability, strict citation-based verifiability, and regulatory discipline. The novelty lies in the fact that the comparison is conducted not in the abstract form of RAG versus fine-tuning, but at the level of individual pipeline components and from the perspective of operational trade-offs: it is shown that retrieval and ranking form a truth scaffold and a channel for knowledge refresh, whereas fine-tuning acts as a delicate regulator of format, terminology, and epistemic precision without resolving the problem of obsolescence in parametric representations. The article concludes in favor of hybrid schemes that combine hybrid retrieval, reranking, and strict citation rules with lightweight, parameter-efficient model adaptations, thereby enabling reproducible, controllable, and scalable operation of domain-specific search systems. The article is intended for researchers in information retrieval, engineers of applied RAG systems, and practitioners deploying generative models in high-risk domains.

Keywords

domain-specific search, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, LLM fine-tuning, hybrid retrieval, reranking

References

Ayala, O., & Bechard, P. (2024). Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 6, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-industry.19

Bruch, S., Gai, S., & Ingber, A. (2024). An Analysis of Fusion Functions for Hybrid Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596512

Chen, X., & Wiseman, S. (2023). BM25 Query Augmentation Learned End-to-End. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.14087

Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, H. (2023, December 18). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997

Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., & Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685

Jagerman, R., Zhuang, H., Qin, Z., Wang, X., & Bendersky, M. (2023, May 5). Query Expansion by Prompting Large Language Models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03653

Jiang, Z., Sun, M., Liang, L., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Retrieve, Summarize, Plan: Advancing Multi-hop Question Answering with an Iterative Approach. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.13101

Merola, C., & Singh, J. (2025). Reconstructing Context: Evaluating Advanced Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19754

Pradeep, R., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Yates, A., & Lin, J. (2022). Squeezing Water from a Stone: A Bag of Tricks for Further Improving Cross-Encoder Effectiveness for Reranking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13185, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_44

Pradeep, R., Thakur, N., Sharifymoghaddam, S., Zhang, E., Nguyen, R., Campos, D., Craswell, N., & Lin, J. (2025). Ragnarök: A Reusable RAG Framework and Baselines for TREC 2024 Retrieval-Augmented Generation Track. Advances in Information Retrieval: 47th European Conference on Information Retrieval, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88708-6_9

Thakur, N., Reimers, N., Rücklé, A., Srivastava, A. K., & Gurevych, I. (2021). BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2104.08663

Zeng, S., Zhang, J., He, P., Liu, Y., Xing, Y., Xu, H., Ren, J., Chang, Y., Wang, S., Yin, D., & Tang, J. (2024). The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, 4505–4524. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.267

Zhao, W. X., Liu, J., Ren, R., & Wen, J.-R. (2024). Dense Text Retrieval Based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(4), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637870

Zhu, X., Xie, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Hu, W. (2025). Knowledge Graph-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.06864

Download and View Statistics

Views: 0   |   Downloads: 0

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Verma, K. (2026). Comparative Analysis of RAG Algorithms and LLM Fine-Tuning Methods for Domain-Specific Search Tasks. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume08Issue04-03