★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.com Publisher Home ↗
Engineering and Technology OPEN ACCESS

Comparative Analysis of RAG Algorithms and LLM Fine-Tuning Methods for Domain-Specific Search Tasks

Kapil Verma
Software Engineer, Google, Mountain View, CA, USA
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajet/Volume08Issue04-03
tajet 2026
VOL. 8 / NO. 4 APRIL
FULL TEXT PP. 32-40
PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME 8
ISSUE 4
YEAR 2026
PAGES 32-40
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

The article examines the comparative properties of Retrieval-Augmented Generation algorithms and large-language-model fine-tuning methods in the context of domain-specific search tasks with a high cost of error. The aim is to identify operating regimes in which RAG and fine-tuning differentially affect the accuracy of top-ranked results, the evidential quality of answers, and the safety of handling sensitive data. The relevance of the study is driven by the rapid growth of industrial domain-specific search systems that must simultaneously ensure knowledge updatability, strict citation-based verifiability, and regulatory discipline. The novelty lies in the fact that the comparison is conducted not in the abstract form of RAG versus fine-tuning, but at the level of individual pipeline components and from the perspective of operational trade-offs: it is shown that retrieval and ranking form a truth scaffold and a channel for knowledge refresh, whereas fine-tuning acts as a delicate regulator of format, terminology, and epistemic precision without resolving the problem of obsolescence in parametric representations. The article concludes in favor of hybrid schemes that combine hybrid retrieval, reranking, and strict citation rules with lightweight, parameter-efficient model adaptations, thereby enabling reproducible, controllable, and scalable operation of domain-specific search systems. The article is intended for researchers in information retrieval, engineers of applied RAG systems, and practitioners deploying generative models in high-risk domains.

RESEARCH TOPICS

Keywords

domain-specific search Retrieval-Augmented Generation LLM fine-tuning hybrid retrieval reranking

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Ayala, O., & Bechard, P. (2024). Reducing hallucination in structured outputs via Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 6, 228–238. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-industry.19
  2. Bruch, S., Gai, S., & Ingber, A. (2024). An Analysis of Fusion Functions for Hybrid Retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3596512
  3. Chen, X., & Wiseman, S. (2023). BM25 Query Augmentation Learned End-to-End. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2305.14087
  4. Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, H. (2023, December 18). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997
  5. Hu, E. J., Shen, Y., Wallis, P., Allen-Zhu, Z., Li, Y., Wang, S., & Chen, W. (2021). LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2106.09685
  6. Jagerman, R., Zhuang, H., Qin, Z., Wang, X., & Bendersky, M. (2023, May 5). Query Expansion by Prompting Large Language Models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03653
  7. Jiang, Z., Sun, M., Liang, L., & Zhang, Z. (2024). Retrieve, Summarize, Plan: Advancing Multi-hop Question Answering with an Iterative Approach. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.13101
  8. Merola, C., & Singh, J. (2025). Reconstructing Context: Evaluating Advanced Chunking Strategies for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19754
  9. Pradeep, R., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Li, Y., Yates, A., & Lin, J. (2022). Squeezing Water from a Stone: A Bag of Tricks for Further Improving Cross-Encoder Effectiveness for Reranking. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13185, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_44
  10. Pradeep, R., Thakur, N., Sharifymoghaddam, S., Zhang, E., Nguyen, R., Campos, D., Craswell, N., & Lin, J. (2025). Ragnarök: A Reusable RAG Framework and Baselines for TREC 2024 Retrieval-Augmented Generation Track. Advances in Information Retrieval: 47th European Conference on Information Retrieval, 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88708-6_9
  11. Thakur, N., Reimers, N., Rücklé, A., Srivastava, A. K., & Gurevych, I. (2021). BEIR: A Heterogeneous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2104.08663
  12. Zeng, S., Zhang, J., He, P., Liu, Y., Xing, Y., Xu, H., Ren, J., Chang, Y., Wang, S., Yin, D., & Tang, J. (2024). The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, 4505–4524. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.267
  13. Zhao, W. X., Liu, J., Ren, R., & Wen, J.-R. (2024). Dense Text Retrieval Based on Pretrained Language Models: A Survey. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 42(4), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637870
  14. Zhu, X., Xie, Y., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Hu, W. (2025). Knowledge Graph-Guided Retrieval Augmented Generation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.06864