Modern organizations increasingly confront a dual imperative: to extract high-value analytical insight from exponentially growing data volumes while simultaneously containing the spiraling operational and capital expenditures associated with cloud infrastructure. This tension has produced a new generation of data-intensive architectures that merge cloud data warehousing, serverless computing, and event-driven orchestration. Among these, Amazon Redshift–centered ecosystems have emerged as a dominant paradigm for large-scale analytics, yet their economic, architectural, and performance implications remain under-theorized when integrated with contemporary serverless platforms. Building on the design patterns, optimization strategies, and practical recipes documented in Amazon Redshift Cookbook (Worlikar, Patel, & Challa, 2025), this article develops a comprehensive analytical framework that situates Redshift within the broader scholarly discourse on cloud-native and function-as-a-service (FaaS) systems. By synthesizing insights from virtualization research, cost-optimization studies, auto-scaling theory, and stateful serverless architectures, the paper argues that Redshift is no longer merely a static analytical warehouse but a dynamic, programmable analytical substrate capable of being orchestrated through ephemeral compute units.

The results of this synthesis demonstrate that Redshift-based serverless analytics pipelines can significantly reduce idle resource costs and improve operational agility, but they also introduce new forms of architectural fragility related to orchestration complexity and state management. The discussion section situates these findings within longstanding debates on cloud efficiency, the limits of auto-scaling, and the future of data-centric computing. It concludes that Redshift’s evolution into a serverless-friendly analytical core represents a paradigmatic shift in how data warehouses are conceptualized, transforming them from monolithic systems into flexible participants in distributed, event-driven ecosystems. This shift has profound implications for both researchers and practitioners seeking to design sustainable, high-performance cloud data platforms.

Cloud data warehousing, Amazon Redshift, Serverless computing

Amazon. 2024. AWS Step Functions | Serverless Microservice Orchestration.

Baset, S. A., Wang, L., & Tang, C. (2012). Towards an understanding of oversubscription in cloud.

Wang, L., Li, M., Zhang, Y., Ristenpart, T., & Swift, M. (2018). Peeking Behind the Curtains of Serverless Platforms.

Deochake, S. (2023). Cloud Cost Optimization: A Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Case Studies.

Agache, A., Brooker, M., Iordache, A., Liguori, A., Neugebauer, R., Piwonka, P., & Popa, D.-M. (2020). Firecracker: Lightweight virtualization for serverless applications.

Amazon. 2022. AWS Lambda Service Level Agreement.

Qu, C., Calheiros, R. N., & Buyya, R. (2018). Auto-scaling web applications in clouds: A taxonomy and survey.

Worlikar, S., Patel, H., & Challa, A. (2025). Amazon Redshift Cookbook: Recipes for building modern data warehousing solutions. Packt Publishing Ltd.

Kratzke, N., & Quint, P. C. (2017). Understanding cloud-native applications after 10 years of cloud computing.

Barcelona-Pons, D., Sánchez-Artigas, M., París, G., Sutra, P., & García-López, P. (2019). On the FaaS Track: Building Stateful Distributed Applications with Serverless Architectures.

Amazon. 2024. Cloud Object Storage | Amazon S3 – Amazon Web Services.

Ascigil, O., Tasiopoulos, A. G., Phan, T. K., Sourlas, V., Psaras, I., & Pavlou, G. (2021). Resource provisioning and allocation in function-as-a-service edge-clouds.

Amazon. 2024. Configuring provisioned concurrency for a function.

Bhasi, V. M., Gunasekaran, J. R., Sharma, A., Kandemir, M. T., & Das, C. (2022). Cypress: Input size-sensitive container provisioning and request scheduling for serverless platforms.