Engineering and Technology
| Open Access | Architectures and Cryptographic Paradigms for Real-Time Secure Communication in Autonomous and Embedded Sensor Systems
Dr. Lukas M. Reinhardt , Department of Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, GermanyAbstract
The rapid proliferation of autonomous systems, cyber-physical infrastructures, and sensor-driven embedded platforms has fundamentally reshaped contemporary digital ecosystems, creating unprecedented demands for secure, real-time communication mechanisms. Autonomous vehicles, industrial automation frameworks, distributed robotics, and intelligent surveillance systems increasingly rely on continuous streams of sensor data whose confidentiality, integrity, and availability are mission-critical. Within this evolving technological context, cryptographic techniques must reconcile two traditionally conflicting objectives: strong security guarantees and stringent real-time performance constraints. Classical cryptographic models, originally designed for desktop computing or offline data protection, are often ill-suited to latency-sensitive, resource-constrained environments typical of embedded and autonomous systems. This research article presents a comprehensive theoretical and analytical exploration of real-time encryption and secure communication architectures for sensor data in autonomous systems, grounded in established cryptographic literature and recent advances in system-level security design.
Drawing extensively on foundational cryptographic theories and implementation studies, this work situates contemporary real-time encryption challenges within their historical evolution, tracing the progression from early block cipher designs to modern hardware-assisted cryptographic frameworks. Particular emphasis is placed on symmetric encryption mechanisms, especially the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and its derivatives, due to their prevalence in embedded deployments and hardware acceleration compatibility. The article critically examines how algorithmic structure, key management strategies, and implementation platforms influence latency, throughput, and resilience against cryptanalytic attacks. As autonomous systems increasingly operate in adversarial and unpredictable environments, the security of sensor data transmission becomes inseparable from system safety and reliability, a relationship underscored by recent scholarly work on secure autonomous communication frameworks (Patil & Deshpande, 2025).
Methodologically, this study adopts an analytical research design, synthesizing insights from cryptographic standards, FPGA and hardware-based implementation studies, multimedia and real-time data protection research, and network security frameworks. Rather than presenting experimental benchmarks, the analysis interprets reported performance characteristics and security properties across the literature to derive system-level implications for real-time sensor communication. This approach enables a nuanced examination of trade-offs between encryption strength, computational overhead, energy consumption, and latency. The findings suggest that secure real-time communication in autonomous systems cannot be achieved through algorithm selection alone but requires an integrated architectural perspective that aligns cryptographic primitives with hardware capabilities, communication protocols, and operational constraints.
The discussion advances a theoretical framework for understanding cryptographic suitability in autonomous sensor networks, engaging with competing scholarly viewpoints on selective encryption, full-stream encryption, and adaptive security models. Limitations of existing approaches are critically assessed, including vulnerabilities arising from implementation weaknesses, side-channel exposure, and scalability challenges. The article concludes by identifying future research directions, emphasizing the need for context-aware cryptographic systems that dynamically balance security and performance in real time. By providing an extensive, theory-driven analysis, this work contributes to the academic discourse on secure autonomous systems and offers conceptual guidance for researchers and system architects navigating the complex intersection of cryptography, real-time computing, and embedded system design.
Keywords
Real-time encryption, autonomous systems security, sensor data protection, embedded cryptography
References
Gladman, B. A specification for Rijndael, the AES algorithm.
Maples, T. B., & Spanos, G. A. Performance study of a selective encryption scheme for the security of networked real-time video.
Patil, A. A., & Deshpande, S. Real-time encryption and secure communication for sensor data in autonomous systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(415), 41–55.
Bassil, C., et al. Critical voice network security analysis and new approach for securing Voice over IP communications.
Daemen, J., & Rijmen, V. The block cipher Rijndael.
Atul, M., et al. FPGA implementation of AES algorithm.
Liu, X., & Eskicioglu, A. M. Selective encryption of multimedia content in distribution networks.
Lee, A. NIST Special Publication 800-21: Guideline for implementing cryptography in the federal government.
Menezes, A., et al. Handbook of applied cryptography.
Hoang, T., & Nguyen, V. An efficient FPGA implementation of the Advanced Encryption Standard algorithm.
Cole, E., et al. Network security bible.
Stallings, W. Cryptography and network security: Principles and practice.
Stinson, D. R. Cryptography: Theory and practice.
Nakahara, J., et al. Square attack on extended Rijndael block cipher.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Lukas M. Reinhardt

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

