Engineering and Technology
| Open Access | A Comprehensive Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of IoT Application Layer and Wireless Communication Protocols for Constrained and Heterogeneous Networks
Dr. Michael R. Hensley , Department of Computer and Communication Engineering, Northbridge University, United KingdomAbstract
The rapid expansion of the Internet of Things (IoT) has fundamentally transformed modern communication ecosystems by enabling billions of heterogeneous devices to sense, process, and exchange data across diverse environments. At the core of this transformation lies the critical role of communication protocols, particularly application layer protocols and wireless access technologies, which must operate efficiently under stringent constraints related to energy consumption, bandwidth availability, latency, scalability, and reliability. This research article presents an extensive empirical and theoretical analysis of widely adopted IoT application layer protocols and supporting wireless communication technologies, drawing strictly from established academic studies, experimental evaluations, and standardized technical discussions. The study synthesizes comparative insights from empirical experiments, performance evaluations, and protocol surveys to analyze how design philosophies, architectural choices, and operational mechanisms influence protocol behavior in constrained networks. Beyond performance metrics, the article deeply explores theoretical trade-offs, interoperability challenges, and the evolving relationship between application layer protocols and underlying wireless technologies such as ZigBee, Wi-Fi variants, WiMAX, cellular generations, and emerging short-range and wide-area wireless solutions. By elaborating on nuanced protocol characteristics, counter-arguments in protocol selection, and practical deployment considerations, this work identifies critical research gaps and conceptual limitations in existing evaluations. The findings highlight that no single protocol or wireless technology is universally optimal; instead, performance and suitability are highly context-dependent, shaped by application requirements, network scale, and environmental constraints. This article contributes a holistic, publication-ready synthesis intended to support researchers, system architects, and practitioners in making informed protocol design and selection decisions while outlining future research directions for scalable, energy-efficient, and interoperable IoT communication systems.
Keywords
Internet of Things, Application Layer Protocols, Wireless Communication Technologies, Constrained Networks
References
Abdelrahman, R., Mustafa, A., and Osman, A. (2015). A comparison between IEEE 802.11a, b, g, n and ac standards. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 17(5).
Abdul, A. S. (2024). Skew variation analysis in distributed battery management systems using CAN FD and chained SPI for 192-cell architectures. Journal of Electrical Systems, 20(6s), 3109–3117.
Bakare, B. I., and Alalibo, T. J. (2018). Gigabit fidelity (GI-FI) as future wireless technology in Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 7(12), 1–6.
Betters, E., and Hall, C. (2018). What is ZigBee and why is it important for your smart home? Pocket-lint.
Chettri, L., and Bera, R. (2019). A comprehensive survey on internet of things towards 5G wireless systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 7(1), 16–32.
Karagiannis, V., Chatzimisios, P., Vazquez-Gallego, F., and Alonso-Zarate, J. (2015). A survey on application layer protocols for the internet of things. Transactions on IoT and Cloud Computing, 3(1), 11–17.
Kayal, P., and Perros, H. (2017). A comparison of IoT application layer protocols through a smart parking implementation. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Innovations in Clouds, Internet and Networks, IEEE.
Mijovic, S., Shehu, E., and Buratti, C. (2016). Comparing application layer protocols for the internet of things via experimentation. IEEE International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry.
Nastase, L., Sandu, I. E., and Popescu, N. (2017). An experimental evaluation of application layer protocols for the internet of things. Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(4), 403–412.
Poole, I. (2018). IEEE 802.11 standards and Wi-Fi specifications. Radio-Electronics.com.
Ray, B. (2018). WiFi’s future: examining 802.11ad, 802.11ah HaLow and others. Link Labs.
Tandale, U., Momin, B., and Seetharam, D. P. (2017). An empirical study of application layer protocols for IoT. International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing, IEEE.
Yassein, M. B., and Shatnawi, M. Q. (2016). Application layer protocols for the internet of things: a survey. International Conference on Engineering and MIS, IEEE.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Michael R. Hensley
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.