The construction sector is a major consumer of raw materials and a significant generator of waste. Transitioning from linear to circular material flows in construction requires integrated approaches encompassing material science, waste processing technologies, procurement strategies, and policy and organizational mechanisms. This paper synthesizes evidence from technical studies on recycling and reuse of construction materials, case studies on deconstruction practices, life-cycle perspectives, material flow analysis, and procurement and management literature to present a unified theoretical and practical framework for circular construction. The manuscript critically examines recycled concrete and masonry aggregates, alternative thermal insulation from textile wastes, wood–plastic composites with secondary materials, and systemic reuse of building elements. It further explores the role of procurement and project delivery methods in enabling circular outcomes, identifying barriers, drivers and stakeholder interactions. Methodologically, the research integrates a rigorous literature synthesis, comparative conceptual modelling, and a reasoned normative framework that maps technical potential to procurement strategies and organizational processes. Results show that while recycled aggregates and alternative insulation materials can meet many technical performance parameters, their adoption is conditioned by quality assurance mechanisms, regulatory clarity, and procurement incentives. Sustainable procurement models — particularly collaborative and integrated procurement practices — significantly improve reuse outcomes by aligning incentives, fostering trust and enabling whole-life cost assessments. The discussion elaborates on theoretical implications for industrial ecology in construction, critiques existing lifecycle assessment approaches, and offers detailed recommendations for policy, practice and research. Limitations include reliance on secondary literature and heterogeneity in empirical studies; future research should deploy multi-scalar empirical trials combining material testing with procurement pilots. The paper concludes with a comprehensive, actionable roadmap to accelerate circular construction that bridges technical feasibility and organizational adoption through targeted policy, procurement reform, and cross-sectoral collaboration.

Circular construction, recycled aggregates, reuse potential

Purnell, P.; Dunster, A. 20-Recycling of Concrete. In Management, Recycling and Reuse of Waste Composites; Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering; Goodship, V., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2010; pp. 569–591. ISBN 978-1-84569-462-3.

De Venny, A.S. Recycling of Demolished Masonry Rubble. Ph.D. Thesis, Napier University, Napier, New Zealand, 1999. Available online: https://napier-repository.worktribe.com/output/281000/recycling-of-demolished-masonry-rubble (accessed on 28 March 2025).

Charytonowicz, J.; Skowroński, M. Reuse of Building Materials. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 1633–1637.

Joseph, P.; Tretsiakova-McNally, S. Sustainable Non-Metallic Building Materials. Sustainability 2010, 2, 400–427.

Durmisevic, E.; Beurskens, P.R.; Adrosevic, R.; Westerdijk, R. Systemic View on Reuse Potential of Building Elements, Components and Systems: Comprehensive Framework for Assessing Reuse Potential of Building Elements. In Proceedings of the International HISER Conference on Advances in Recycling and Management of Construction and Demolition Waste, Delft, The Netherlands, 21–23 June 2017.

Briga-Sá, A.; Nascimento, D.; Teixeira, N.; Pinto, J.; Caldeira, F.; Varum, H.; Paiva, A. Textile Waste as an Alternative Thermal Insulation Building Material Solution. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 38, 155–160.

Guy, B. The Optimization of Building Deconstruction for Department of Defense Facilities: Ft. McClellan Deconstruction Project. J. Green. Build. 2006, 1, 102–122.

Keskisaari, A.; Kärki, T. The Use of Waste Materials in Wood-Plastic Composites and Their Impact on the Profitability of the Product. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 134, 257–261.

Bojan, M.; Marina, B.; Ivana, B.P.; Nina, Š. Use of Recycled Aggregate Concrete for Energy Efficient Buildings. 3rd R.N. In Proceedings of the Raikar Memorial International Conference and Gettu-Kodur International Symposium on Advances in Science and Technology of Concrete, Mumbai, India, 14–15 December 2018.

Hobbs, G.; Adams, K. Reuse of Building Products and Materials—Barriers and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the International HISER Conference on Advances in Recycling and Management of Construction and Demolition Waste, Delft, The Netherlands, 21–23 June 2017.

Elhag, T.; Eapen, S.; Ballal, T. Moderating claims and disputes through collaborative procurement. Construction Innovation, 2019, 20(1), 79–95.

El-Sayegh, S.M. Evaluating the effectiveness of project delivery methods. Journal of Construction Management and Economics, 2008, 23(5), 457–465.

Eriksson, P.E.; Laan, A. Procurement effects on trust and control in client-contractor relationships. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2007, 14(4), 387–399.

Eriksson, P.E.; Westerberg, M. Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(2), 197–208.

Ershadi, M.; Jefferies, M.; Davis, P.; Mojtahedi, M. Achieving sustainable procurement in construction projects: the pivotal role of a project management office. Construction Economics and Building, 2021, 21(1), 45–64.

Esa, M.R.; Halog, A.; Rigamonti, L. Developing strategies for managing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia based on the concept of circular economy. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2017, 19(3), 1144–1154.

Eyiah-Botwe, E.; Aigbavboa, C.; Thwala, W.D. Critical barriers affecting stakeholder management in the construction industry. 2015.

Ghaffar, S.H.; Burman, M.; Braimah, N. Pathways to circular construction: an integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 244, 118710.

Ghomi, E.R.; Khosravi, F.; Tahavori, M.A.; Ramakrishna, S. Circular economy: a comparison between the case of Singapore and France. Materials Circular Economy, 2021, 3(1), 1–12.

Gorecki, J. Circular economy maturity in construction companies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 471(11), 112090.

Guerra, B.C.; Shahi, S.; Mollaei, A.; Skaf, N.; Weber, O.; Leite, F.; Haas, C. Circular economy applications in the construction industry: a global scan of trends and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 324, 129125.

Kanther, Shreya. Circular Framework in the Design & Planning Phase of Construction. Full-Text Theses & Dissertations. 2025. Available online: https://jdc.jefferson.edu/diss_masters/47 (accessed 28 March 2025).

Bergsdal, H.; Brattebø, H.; Bohne, R. A.; Müller, D. B. Dynamic material flow analysis for Norway's dwelling stock. 2007.

Bilec, M.; Ries, R.; Matthews, H. S.; Sharrard, A. Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2006, 12, 207–215.

Boulding, K. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. 1966.

Bribián, I. Z.; Capilla, A. V.; Usón, A. Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. 2011, 46, 1133–1140.

Buyle, M.; Braet, J.; Audenaert, A. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. 2013, 26, 379–388.

Chau, C.; Leung, T.; Ng, W. J. A review on life cycle assessment, life cycle energy assessment and life cycle carbon emissions assessment on buildings. 2015, 143, 395–413.