Routing Strategies In Fanet Networks: A Systematic Review Of Protocol Families, Performance Indicators, And Research Gaps
Jolimbetova E.D. , PhD student, TUIT named after Al-Khwarizmi, UzbekistanAbstract
Flying Ad hoc Networks (FANETs) are formed by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) that communicate over wireless links without fixed infrastructure. High node mobility, frequent topology changes and the three-dimensional nature of the environment make routing a challenging task. This paper presents a compact systematic review of routing strategies in FANETs. We classify existing protocols into five main families: topological (proactive, reactive and hybrid), geographic (position-based), cluster-based (hierarchical), opportunistic (delay-tolerant) and intelligent (AI-based and bio-inspired). Typical performance indicators such as packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, throughput, routing overhead and energy consumption are summarized, and their relationship with different protocol classes is discussed. The analysis shows that most existing solutions are adaptations of MANET/VANET algorithms and usually optimize only a subset of metrics. Key research gaps include energy-aware routing, stable operation under extreme mobility and sparse topologies, and deeper integration of learning-based methods. The review provides a concise overview of current approaches and outlines directions for future research in FANET routing.
Keywords
FANET, unmanned aerial vehicles, ad-hoc networks
References
Bekmezci, I., Sahingoz, O. K., & Temel, Ş. (2013). Flying ad-hoc networks (FANETs): A survey. Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), 1254-1270.
Oubbati, O. S., Lakas, A., Zhou, F., Güneş, M., & Yagoubi, M. B. (2017). A survey on position-based routing protocols for Flying Ad hoc Networks (FANETs). Vehicular Communications, 10, 29-56.
Arafat, M. Y., & Moh, S. (2019). Routing protocols for unmanned aerial vehicle networks: A survey. IEEE access, 7, 99694-99720.
Oubbati, O. S., Atiquzzaman, M., Lorenz, P., Tareque, M. H., & Hossain, M. S. (2019). Routing in flying ad hoc networks: Survey, constraints, and future challenge perspectives. IEEE access, 7, 81057-81105.
Gupta, L., Jain, R., & Vaszkun, G. (2015). Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 18(2), 1123-1152.
Zheng, Z., Sangaiah, A. K., & Wang, T. (2018). Adaptive communication protocols in flying ad hoc network. IEEE Communications Magazine, 56(1), 136-142.
Lakew, D. S., Sa’ad, U., Dao, N. N., Na, W., & Cho, S. (2020). Routing in flying ad hoc networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE communications surveys & tutorials, 22(2), 1071-1120.
Khan, M. F., Yau, K. L. A., Noor, R. M., & Imran, M. A. (2019). Routing schemes in FANETs: A survey. Sensors, 20(1), 38.
Sang, Q., Wu, H., Xing, L., & Xie, P. (2020). Review and comparison of emerging routing protocols in flying ad hoc networks. Symmetry, 12(6), 971.
Sharma, V., Kumar, R., & Kumar, N. (2018). DPTR: Distributed priority tree-based routing protocol for FANETs. Computer Communications, 122, 129-151.
Download and View Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jolimbetova E.D.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.


Engineering and Technology
| Open Access |
DOI: