★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Engineering and Technology OPEN ACCESS

Interpretable AI in Credit Scoring: A Comparative Survey of SHAP, LIME, and Hybrid Approaches

Sai Prashanth Pathi
Independent Researcher, USA
Jahnavi Swetha Pothineni
Independent Researcher, USA
tajet 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 11 NOVEMBER
VOLUME 7
ISSUE 11
YEAR 2025
PAGES 151–155

Abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) is critical in domains like credit scoring where model decisions must be transparent and accountable. This survey paper compares three local explanation techniques—SHAP, LIME, and ensemble Hybrid approach that integrates both. We evaluate these methods on consistency, variability, and suitability for regulatory environments. Emphasis is placed on use in credit risk modeling, with insights drawn from both literature and practical evaluation.

Keywords

Explainable AI (XAI) SHAP LIME Local interpretability Hybrid model explanations Credit Risk Modeling

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. M. T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 1135–1144.
  2. S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017.
  3. D. Slack, S. Hilgard, E. Jia, S. Singh, and R. Sohoni, “Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial attacks on post hoc explanation methods,” in Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES), 2020, pp. 180–186.
  4. D. Alvarez-Melis and T. S. Jaakkola, “On the robustness of interpretability methods,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.08049, 2018.
  5. S. Krishna and H. Lakkaraju, “Disagreement among local explanation methods: A comparative study on real-world datasets,” in Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2022, pp. 678–689.
  6. S. Carta et al., “Explainable AI in finance: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.01130, 2021.
  7. G. Vilone and L. Longo, “Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence,” Information Fusion, vol. 76, pp. 89–106, 2021.
  8. U. Bhatt et al., “Explainable machine learning in deployment,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.01962, 2020.
  9. R. K. Mothilal, A. Sharma, and C. Tan, “Explaining ma- chine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations,” in Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020, pp. 607–617.
  10. Lending Club Loan Data, Kaggle Dataset, https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/adarshsng/ lending-club-loan-data-csv?resource=download&select= LCDataDictionary.xlsx