★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Engineering and Technology OPEN ACCESS

AI-Enhanced Devops Frameworks For Automated Security And Continuous Delivery In Cloud-Native Systems

Rajesh N. Iyer
Center for Artificial Intelligence in Security Engineering, Indian Institute of Science y, India
tajet 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 11 NOVEMBER
VOLUME 7
ISSUE 11
YEAR 2025
PAGES 124-128

Abstract

The convergence of DevOps practices with artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-native architectures represents a transformative evolution in contemporary software engineering. Organizations increasingly require frameworks that harmonize agility, reliability, and security while managing the complexities of distributed systems, microservices, and continuous delivery pipelines. This research explores the integration of AI-driven mechanisms within DevOps to automate vulnerability management, patch deployment, and demand forecasting, thereby optimizing operational efficiency and reducing exposure to cyber threats. Through an exhaustive review of seminal literature and empirical studies, the paper identifies key dimensions of DevOps, including culture, automation, measurement, and sharing, and investigates how AI interventions can augment these dimensions to enable predictive, real-time security management. The methodology synthesizes theoretical and practical insights from canonical texts, cloud deployment frameworks, microservices observability tools, and AI-driven security systems to propose a comprehensive conceptual model for secure, automated, and intelligent CI/CD pipelines. Findings indicate that AI-enhanced DevOps frameworks significantly improve patching efficiency, reduce system downtime, facilitate intelligent orchestration of resources, and enhance the overall security posture of cloud-native applications without impeding delivery velocity. This research contributes both theoretically and practically by delineating pathways for integrating AI within DevOps pipelines, highlighting operational limitations, and proposing future directions, including adaptive orchestration, standardized observability protocols, and governance models for hybrid and containerized cloud environments.

Keywords

DevOps Continuous Delivery AI-Driven Security

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Kim, G., Humble, J., Debois, P., & Willis, J. (2016). The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, & Security in Technology Organizations. IT Revolution Press.
  2. Bass, L., Weber, I., & Zhu, L. (2015). DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  3. Humble, J., & Farley, D. (2010). Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Addison-Wesley.
  4. Fitzgerald, B., & Stol, K. J. (2017). Continuous software engineering: A roadmap and agenda. Journal of Systems and Software, 123, 176–189.
  5. Sharma, A., & Coyne, B. (2017). Securing DevOps: Security in the Cloud. O’Reilly Media.
  6. Red Hat. (2020). Security best practices for containers. Retrieved from https://www.redhat.com/en/resources/security-best-practices-containers-whitepaper
  7. Venkata, B. (2020). END-TO-END CI/CD DEPLOYMENT OF RESTFUL MICROSERVICES IN THE CLOUD.
  8. HashiCorp. (2021). Managing Secrets with Vault: Best Practices. Retrieved from https://www.hashicorp.com/resources/vault-secrets-management
  9. Martins, C., Sousa, P., & Silva, M. (2020). A framework for intelligent continuous integration in DevOps. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 30(06), 787–811.
  10. Docker Inc. (2021). Docker security overview. Retrieved from https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/overview/
  11. Lwakatare, L. E., Kuvaja, P., & Oivo, M. (2016). Dimensions of DevOps. International Conference on Agile Software Development, 212–217.
  12. Fernandes, A. A., & Vinicius, G. (2019). Observability in microservices architecture: An analysis of open-source tools. Journal of Internet Services and Applications.
  13. Kavis, M. J. (2014). Architecting the Cloud: Design Decisions for Cloud Computing Service Models (SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS). Wiley.
  14. Bhardwaj, A., & Singh, H. (2022). Enhancing cybersecurity through intelligent patch automation. International Journal of Information Security Science, 11(1), 45–57.
  15. Chen, Y., Zhao, Q., & Wang, T. (2021). AI-driven vulnerability prioritization in automated patch management systems. Computers & Security, 105, 102228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102228
  16. Malik, G., Brahmbhatt, R., & Prashasti. (2025). AI-driven security and inventory optimization: Automating vulnerability management and demand forecasting in CI/CD-powered retail systems. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.3855
  17. Garg, S., & Khurana, M. (2020). Comparative analysis of patch management tools for enterprise security. International Journal of Computer Applications, 176(15), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2020919914
  18. Harrison, J., & Meyer, R. (2021). Risk-based vulnerability management: A data-centric approach. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security, 24(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447733
  19. IBM X-Force. (2020). 2020 threat intelligence index. IBM Security. https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/ADLMYLAZ
  20. Li, F., Xie, Z., & Xu, J. (2022). Real-time patching with reduced downtime using AI. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 19(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2022.3141237
DISCOVER RELATED RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Explore published articles on related topics and research interests.