★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
editor@theamericanjournals.com Publisher Home ↗
Engineering and Technology Book OPEN ACCESS

Digital Integration of EHS-Compliance and Risk Management in Industrial Enterprises: the EHS-Digital Loop Authoring Platform

Tanvi Bhushan
Master of Science in Environmental Engineering from Lamar University, Texas, USA
Dhaval Sikligar
M.S., Computer Systems Architect, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) – Industrial IoT & Low‑Code Manufacturing Systems, USA
DOI Crossref DOI 10.37547/tajet/book-01
2025: Reference Guide Book
FULL TEXT PP. 1-79
DOWNLOAD PDF

View all articles in this issue ↗

VOLUME —
ISSUE —
YEAR 2025
PAGES 1-79
RESEARCH OVERVIEW

Abstract

The accelerating convergence of digitalisation, sustainability demands, and heightened societal expectations is transforming the way industrial enterprises manage Environmental, Health & Safety (EHS) risks. Once regarded chiefly as a cost of compliance, EHS has now become a strategic lever that shapes corporate resilience, investor confidence, and licence to operate. At the same time, rapid advances in industrial IoT, cloud analytics, and artificial intelligence are unlocking unprecedented volumes of operational data yet posing new integration challenges for safety professionals, risk managers, and board-level decision-makers alike.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
SOURCES & SCHOLARSHIP

References

  1. Takala, J., Hämäläinen, P., Sauni, R., Nygård, C. H., Gagliardi, D., & Neupane, S. (2024). Global-, regional-and country-level estimates of the work-related burden of diseases and accidents in 2019. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 50(2), 73.
  2. National Safety Council. (n.d.). Managing risks with EHS software and mobile applications. https://www.nsc.org/getmedia/fd92aa4a-fb7d-488e-b39b-93ecb1738189/wp-ehs-software-mobile-apps.pdf
  3. McKinsey & Company. (n.d.). What comes after the 2020 digital dash. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/what-comes-after-the-2020-digital-dash
  4. Foreman, A. M., Friedel, J. E., Ludwig, T. D., Ezerins, M. E., Açikgöz, Y., Bergman, S. M., & Wirth, O. (2023). Establishment-level occupational safety analytics: Challenges and opportunities. International journal of industrial ergonomics, 94, 103428.
  5. Maze, A. (2025, March). The benefits of integrated management systems. Smithers. https://www.smithers.com/resources/2025/march/the-benefits-of-integrated-management-systems
  6. Integrated Standards. (n.d.). Integrated ISO management system audits. https://integrated-standards.com/articles/integrated-management-system-audits
  7. Seminario, M. M. (2020). The Occupational Safety and Health Act at 50—a labor perspective. American journal of public health, 110(5), 642–643.
  8. U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2022). 50 years after the Clean Water Act—Gauging progress. https://www.gao.gov/blog/50-years-after-clean-water-act-gauging-progress
  9. European Commission. (n.d.). REACH Regulation: To protect human health and the environment against the harmful effects of chemical substances. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/chemicals/reach-regulation_en#overview
  10. Podrecca, M., Molinaro, M., Sartor, M., & Orzes, G. (2024). The impact of ISO 45001 on firms' performance: An empirical analysis. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 31(5), 4581–4595.
  11. Lewis, A. (2025). Enhancing OSH Performance: The Impact of ISO 45001. SHIFT: Global EHS Research to Practice, 4(1).
  12. Bayramova, A., Edwards, D. J., Roberts, C., & Rillie, I. (2023). Constructs of leading indicators: A synthesis of safety literature. Journal of safety research, 85, 469–484.
  13. de Ruijter, A., & Guldenmund, F. (2016). The bowtie method: A review. Safety science, 88, 211–218.
  14. Wolters Kluwer. (2022). Conform to ISO 31000 using the bowtie method. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/expert-insights/conform-to-iso-31000-using-the-bowtie-method
  15. Salih, A. M., Raisi‐Estabragh, Z., Galazzo, I. B., Radeva, P., Petersen, S. E., Lekadir, K., & Menegaz, G. (2025). A perspective on explainable artificial intelligence methods: SHAP and LIME. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 7(1), 2400304.
  16. Ponce‐Bobadilla, A. V., Schmitt, V., Maier, C. S., Mensing, S., & Stodtmann, S. (2024). Practical guide to SHAP analysis: explaining supervised machine learning model predictions in drug development. Clinical and Translational Science, 17(11), e70056.
  17. Ali, M. X. M., Arifin, K., Abas, A., Ahmad, M. A., Khairil, M., Cyio, M. B., ... & Ali, M. N. (2022). Systematic literature review on indicators use in safety management practices among utility industries. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(10), 6198.
  18. Online Safety Trainer. (n.d.). Harnessing leading indicators for enhanced workplace safety. https://www.onlinesafetytrainer.com/harnessing-leading-indicators-for-enhanced-workplace-safety
  19. He, Y., He, J., & Wen, N. (2023). The challenges of IoT-based applications in high-risk environments, health and safety industries in the Industry 4.0 era using decision-making approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100347.
  20. Svertoka, E., Saafi, S., Rusu-Casandra, A., Burget, R., Marghescu, I., Hosek, J., & Ometov, A. (2021). Wearables for industrial work safety: A survey. Sensors, 21(11), 3844.
  21. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses – 2023 (Report No. USDL-23-2307). https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh.pdf
  22. Purvis, A. (2024). Safety and health in the steel industry: Data report 2024. World Steel Association. https://worldsteel.org/safety-and-health/safety-and-health-in-the-steel-industry-data-reports/safety-and-health-in-the-steel-industry-data-report-2024
  23. International Energy Agency. (2023). CO2 emissions in 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022
  24. Climatiq. (2024). IEA emissions factors 2024. https://www.climatiq.io/data/source/iea
  25. International Energy Agency. (2024). Emission factors: Database documentation. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/884cd44a-3a59-4359-9bc4-d5c5fb3cc66c/IEA_Methodology_Emission_Factors.pdf
  26. Moon, J., & Ju, B. K. (2024). Wearable Sensors for Healthcare of Industrial Workers: A Scoping Review. Electronics (2079-9292), 13(19).
  27. Ivezic, M., & Ivezic, L. (2021). Explainable AI frameworks. Securing AI. https://securing.ai/ai-security/explainable-ai-frameworks
  28. Lingard, H., Hallowell, M., Salas, R., & Pirzadeh, P. (2017). Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project. Safety Science, 91, 206–220.
  29. Poh, C. Q., Ubeynarayana, C. U., & Goh, Y. M. (2018). Safety leading indicators for construction sites: a machine learning approach. Automation in Construction, 93, 375–386.
  30. Mattr Corp. (2024). 2023 ESG Progress Report. Mattr. https://www.mattr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Mattr-ESG-Progress-Report_short_Aug30.pdf
  31. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2024). Definitive Proxy Statement (Form DEF 14A) – Amazon.com, Inc. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000110465924045910/tm2329302d4_def14a.htm
  32. JBT Corporation (2024). 2023 ESG Report. JBT. https://www.jbtc.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/JBT-2023-ESG-Report.pdf
  33. Graham T. (2024). Construction injuries: A look at the direct and indirect costs. KPA. https://kpa.io/blog/construction-injuries-a-look-at-the-direct-and-indirect-costs/
  34. BASF (2023). In‑focus: Process safety. In Environmental, Social & Governance – Environmental. https://report.basf.com/2023/en/combined-managements-report/environmental-social-governance/environmental/in-focus-process-safety.html
  35. Phillips 66 Company (2023). Annual Report 2023. https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReportArchive/p/NYSE_PSX_2023.pdf
  36. BNamericas (2025). Vivo brings IoT-based security solution to Dow Brasil operations. BNamericas news. https://www.bnamericas.com/en/news/vivo-brings-iot-based-security-solution-to-dow-brasil-operations
  37. Engineering News‑Record (2025). ENR’s Top 400 Contractors Proceed With Caution Amid Intensifying Market Challenges. https://www.enr.com/articles/60778-enrs-top-400-contractors-proceed-with-caution-amid-intensifying-market-challenges
  38. Safesite HQ. About Safesite. https://safesitehq.com/about-safesite/
  39. Advexure (2025). Fewer delays, faster builds: How drone surveying streamlines trade coordination on construction sites. https://advexure.com/blogs/news/fewer-delays-faster-builds-how-drone-surveying-streamlines-trade-coordination-on-construction-sites?srsltid=AfmBOorDDVtgf2iQxxZwiF8XWyjJ8eoxrRWSOJw-HdUqhE7DQpOmC3c_
  40. Scribd. CO₂ saved if Domestic Dwelling were to use hydrogen. https://ru.scribd.com/document/876848719/CO2-saved-if-Domestic-Dwelling-were-to-use-hydrogen