★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Applied Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Forming Professional Congruence in Future Teachers: An Integrative Project-Based Pedagogical Model

N.X. Kobilova
Karshi State Technical University, Karshi, Uzbekistan
tajas 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 12 DECEMBER
VOLUME 7
ISSUE 12
YEAR 2025
PAGES 91-94

Abstract

The article examines professional congruence as an integrative quality of future teachers and proposes a project-based pedagogical model for its purposeful formation. Unlike an approach that treats congruence only as correspondence between inner experience and external behavior, the study considers it through interconnected communicative, emotional-regulatory, behavioral, and reflective components. The methodological framework combines project tasks, pedagogical cases, role-playing, reflective journals, psychological training, observation, questionnaires, and video analysis. The study argues that project activity is particularly valuable because it places pre-service teachers in situations that require them to coordinate personal position, verbal expression, emotional response, and professional action. The reported experimental results indicate positive dynamics in communicative congruence, emotional regulation, behavioral coherence, communicative confidence, and reflective analysis. On this basis, a staged model is proposed for diagnosing, developing, practicing, reflecting on, and assessing professional congruence. The model may be used to strengthen practice-oriented teacher education and to support the formation of an authentic professional identity.

Keywords

Professional congruence future teachers project-based learning

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  2. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
  3. Lyons, N. (2008). Teacher authenticity and education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 945–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.003
  4. Gordon, D. (2013). Communicative authenticity in teaching practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032394
  5. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
  6. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
  7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  8. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  9. Levy, P. K. (2010). Project-based learning and reflective competence development. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(4), 195–204.
  10. Poltorak, E. (2015). Project-based learning in teacher education. European Journal of Education, 50(2), 234–248.
  11. Sharipov, Sh. (2016). Pedagogik mahorat asoslari. Toshkent: O‘qituvchi.
  12. Qodirov, Q. (2018). Pedagogik texnologiyalar va loyihaviy ta’lim. Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya.
  13. Ibragimov, R. (2019). Kommunikativ va refleksiv kompetensiyalarni shakllantirish masalalari. Pedagogika, 4, 45–52.
  14. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.