★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★Open research. Global perspectives.
Applied Sciences OPEN ACCESS

Comparing Neural Networks and Traditional Algorithms in Fraud Detection

Dip Bharatbhai Patel
University of North America, Virginia, USA
tajas 2025
VOL. 7 / NO. 07 JULY
VOLUME 7
ISSUE 07
YEAR 2025
PAGES 128-132

Abstract

Fraud detection has become an essential component of financial security systems. Traditional algorithms have long served as the backbone of these systems. The rise of neural networks is revolutionizing the process as it offers new approaches to identifying complex fraud patterns. The paper presents a comparative analysis of neural networks and traditional algorithms. These include decision trees, rule-based systems, and logistic regression in fraud detection. The comparison is based on scalability, accuracy, interpretability, computational efficiency, and adaptability. The findings reveal that neural networks outperform traditional methods in subtle, non-linear fraud patterns but suffer from interpretability and data requirements. A hybrid detection framework that combines neural intelligence with rule-based logic is proposed for real-time, robust fraud management. For instance, a neural ensemble model achieved over 97% accuracy while traditional systems achieved 89-91%. The paper highlights that the hybrid approach offers optimal results in real-world scenarios.

Keywords

Fraud detection neural networks machine learning traditional algorithms

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alarfaj, F. K., Malik, I., Khan, H. U., Almusallam, N., Ramzan, M., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Credit card fraud detection using state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning algorithms. Ieee Access, 10, 39700-39715. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9755930
  2. De Albuquerque Filho, J. E., Brandao, L. C., Fernandes, B. J. T., & Maciel, A. M. (2022). A review of neural networks for anomaly detection. IEEE Access, 10, 112342-112367. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9925159
  3. Esenogho, E., Mienye, I. D., Swart, T. G., Aruleba, K., & Obaido, G. (2022). A neural network ensemble with feature engineering for improved credit card fraud detection. IEEE access, 10, 16400-16407. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9698195
  4. Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022). Financial fraud: a review of anomaly detection techniques and recent advances. Expert systems With applications, 193, 116429. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417421017164
  5. Innan, N., Sawaika, A., Dhor, A., Dutta, S., Thota, S., Gokal, H., ... & Bennai, M. (2024). Financial fraud detection using quantum graph neural networks. Quantum Machine Intelligence, 6(1), 7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42484-024-00143-6
  6. Karthika, J., & Senthilselvi, A. (2023). Smart credit card fraud detection system based on dilated convolutional neural network with sampling technique. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(20), 31691-31708. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-023-15730-1
  7. Murorunkwere, B. F., Tuyishimire, O., Haughton, D., & Nzabanita, J. (2022). Fraud detection using neural networks: A case study of income tax. Future Internet, 14(6), 168. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/6/168
  8. Osegi, E. N., & Jumbo, E. F. (2021). Comparative analysis of credit card fraud detection in simulated annealing trained artificial neural network and hierarchical temporal memory. Machine Learning with Applications, 6, 100080. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666827021000402?__cf_chl_rt_tk=0rS2DPjV1RGF8wnckHQSxq2ujfxWkVgi7Y2FTxZlYAw-1751346888-1.0.1.1-oTafKdFjXFZ46z4tneVa4EB11CrSqC7x1SffuTXwzJM
  9. Okur, M. R., Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Y., & Taşkın, D. (2021). From Conventional Methods to Contemporary Neural Network Approaches: Financial Fraud Detection. Ethics and Sustainability in Accounting and Finance, Volume III, 215-228. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-33-6636-7_11