The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc <p>E-ISSN <strong>2693-0803</strong></p> <p>DOI Prefix <strong>10.37547/tajpslc</strong></p> <p>Started Year <strong>2019</strong></p> <p>Frequency <strong>Monthly</strong></p> <p>Language <strong>English</strong></p> <p>APC <strong>$250</strong></p> en-US <p><em>Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><strong>Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY)</strong></a>, which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.</em></p> editor@theamericanjournals.com (The USA Journals) tech@theamericanjournals.com (John Mike) Tue, 01 Jul 2025 07:10:24 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.7 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Frameworks, Fundamental Rights, And National Constitutional Identity: A Focus on Selected Jurisdictions https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6319 <p>This study offers a comparative analysis of constitutional frameworks, fundamental rights, and the evolving concept of national constitutional identity across selected jurisdictions. By examining the structures, values, and interpretative approaches of constitutions from both common law and civil law traditions, the research highlights how different countries articulate and safeguard fundamental rights within their unique legal and cultural contexts. The analysis explores the role of constitutional courts, separation of powers, and amendment procedures in shaping the national identity embedded in constitutional texts. Special attention is given to doctrines such as basic structure, proportionality, and judicial review, as well as the impact of supranational entities like the European Union on domestic constitutional autonomy. The findings underscore the dynamic interplay between universal human rights norms and nationally rooted constitutional principles, offering insights into how states reconcile global constitutionalism with local democratic legitimacy and historical narratives.</p> Dr. Javier Ortega Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Javier Ortega https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajpslc/article/view/6319 Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0000