The sustainable management of organic waste is crucial for enhancing the efficiency of biogas production processes. This study investigates the potential of co-digested solid fractions as an alternative feedstock in biogas plants. Co-digestion involves the simultaneous processing of multiple organic waste streams, which can improve the nutrient balance and overall digestibility of the substrate. This research focuses on the composition, digestibility, and biogas yield of co-digested solid fractions derived from agricultural and municipal solid waste. Through experimental analysis, the study evaluates the impact of these fractions on biogas production rates, methane content, and overall process stability. Results demonstrate that co-digested solid fractions can significantly enhance biogas yield compared to traditional single-substrate digestion. Additionally, the use of these fractions contributes to more efficient waste management practices and supports sustainable energy production. The findings highlight the viability of incorporating co-digested solid fractions into biogas plant feedstock strategies, offering a promising solution for optimizing biogas production and advancing waste-to-energy technologies.

Co-digestion, solid fraction, biogas production

AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis, 15th ed. Association ofOfficial Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, USA.

Balsari P., Gioelli F., Menardo S., Paschetta E. 2010. The (re)use ofmechanical separated solid fraction of digested or not digestedslurry in anaerobic digestion plants. In: C.S.C. Cordovil and L.Ferreira (eds.) Proc. 14th Ramiran Int. Conf., Lisboa, Portugal.Available from: http://www.ramiran.net/ramiran2010/docs/ Ramiran2010_0256_final.pdf

de Baere L.A., Devocht M., Van Assche P., Verstraete W. 1984. Influenceof high NaCl and NH4Cl salt levels on methanogenic associations.Water Res. 18:543-8.

Dinuccio E., Balsari P., Berg, W. 2008. Gaseous emissions from the stor-age of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechan-ical separation. Atmos. Environ. 42:2448-59.

Dinuccio E., Cuk D., Rollè L., Gioelli F., Balsari P. 2013. GHG emissionsfrom the storage of the liquid and solid fractions of co-digested pigslurry. In Proc. Int. Conf. on Greenhouse Gases and AnimalAgriculture (GGAA), Dublin, Ireland. Electronic Edition.

Dinuccio E., Paschetta E., Gioelli F., Balsari P. 2010. Efficiency ofmechanical separation of digested and not digested slurry. In:C.S.C. Cordovil and L.

Ferreira (eds.), Proc. 14th Ramiran Int.Conf., Lisboa, Portugal. Available from: http://www.ramiran.net/ramiran2010/docs/Ramiran2010_0229_final.pdf Fabbri C., Labartino N., Manfredi S., Piccinini S. 2013. Biogas, il settoreè strutturato e continua a crescere. L’Informatore Agrario 11:11-6.

Gioelli F., Balsari P., Dinuccio E. 2012. Anaerobic digestion in northernItaly: the situation in Piemonte Region. In Proc. CIGRAgEng Conf.,Valencia, Spain.

Hopfner-Sixt K., Amon T. 2007. Monitoring of agricultural biogas plants- mixing technology and specific values of essential process param-eters. In Proc. 15th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition,Berlin, Germany.

Koster I.W., Lettinga G. 1984. The influence of ammonium-nitrogen onthe specific activity of palletized methanogenic sludge. Agric.Wastes 9:205-16.

Kroeker E.J., Schulte D.D., Sparling A.B., Lapp H.M. 1979. Anaerobictreatment process stability. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 51:718-27.